With the receivers on team right now, there should be more open routes and Lamb ending up with single coverage. I trust Prescott to at least be able to hit open receivers. He is a surviving quarterback, after all.
Teams were playing Dallas and gearing to it's weaknesses. Some defenses were able to force the Dallas offense into compromising situations and take advantage of the opportunities. It wasn't Dak being futile as there was very little open space and with line injuries, the tendency to be overloaded on a lot of plays with a weak receiver group.
These defenses aren't going to change, the book's written. Yes the receiver corps improved, (as is hopefully play design) but dismissing Dak's involvement as he's got 'weaknesses' without exploring what scenario's we want him to avoid is an ostrich strategy based on hope.Yes it's a team game, however, everything goes through the QB.
Exactly what I was thinking, but you said it better!!
yeah i agree. i replied to a thread where i broke down all Daks INT & 10+ were on the WR zigging when he should have zagged. dak had i think 4or5 on him i cannot remember. and searching on here is a nightmare or i’d find the link.
Roger Staubach had four seasons of 15-16 interceptions a season.
And was recently voted the best QB of his era. And is rated top 20 of all time. By everyone.
Ask him if you can just date his daughter and work for him, Ace...maybe where your place for an addition exactly is.
its realy this simple... start attacking weak links on defenses with desicions to make and get the ball out. Funny the "Air Raid" offense looks good when you have 3 stud WR carving up defenses with good desicions...not so much when you have 1 WR and 1 half a WR and a Noah Brown....Stil looks good against bad defenses but good defenses can sit on a 50% MG and Noah Brown all day.
ok stats are real, but we/you dont know if mike is even aware of those stats.
Start changing how a defense has to play you and things are changed. Often dramatically...just not in a fiction story. Force them to have to race to the extremities and linebackers are more on their heels. Especially when facing backs that easily can leave them flat out - behind. That does exist now as well as forcing more completions deeper down the field and opening screens.
The original comment was in reference to Dak being a failure for his age and interceptions this past season. That was put in place as not being a proof of failure, despite popularity contests along the sidelines.Ask him if you can just date his daughter and work for him, Ace...maybe where your place for an addition exactly is.
Above grace being bestowed in this thread, by yourself, he is a Cowboys member of the Hall of Fame.
Now run back to playing in the street and insult on coming cars...
Over coming obstacles and that involves momentums...not just a Dak item for ridicule.
Fair point on the sorting business. But I actually interpreted it the other way. I considered the guys with the lower pocket times to be releasing the ball sooner. Which may have been an inaccurate interpretation but the fact that Fields had the most pocket time but was tied for the most sacked despite being one of the most athletic QBs in the game makes me lean even further in that direction. He was sacked almost 3X as much as Dak despite having more pocket time. To me that screams holding the ball longer not having better protection. Look at Brady.. sacked 22 times in 733 attempts so over 750 dropbacks but only 2.2 seconds of pocket time. That's getting rid of the ball quicker.. Brady wasn't interested in being hit so the ball was gone in 2.2 seconds whether anybody was open or not. That sort of thing is what makes this yet another raw number that falls woefully short of telling the whole story.
Yep, like any other QB in any other offense?
Sorry excuse for having a dialogue. Do better. I know you can cuz you’re a good poster. What’s the real question you have?
Gawdawmighty, you missed again. Are you really one of those that makes everything about Dak? Ick, I had thought better of you.
