Only because of an absolute fluke. We has the same set of scenarios play out the next game against Seattle - Dak and Zeke turn the ball over, the defense plays horribly and we lose. Against the Browns, same script, turn ball over, defense plays horribly and we lose.
Who gives a ****? We won the damn game. Against SEA or Cleveland, IF the damn defense gets a stop we likely win those games as well.
The fact you Dak haters focus ONLY on what he does negatively over the enormous positive he produced to even give us a chance to win these games is a textbook example of cognitive dissonance and evidence to this effect was amply produced on Sunday with you guys running cover for Dalton’s fumble and “should have been pick 6.” You were falling all over yourselves to carry Dalton’s water after the game.
There are plays that happen every damn game that individually could have had enormous impact on the outcome of said game if they had fell out a different way. What you choose to harp on says a lot about your biases.
Notice that I, for instance, didn’t call Dalton a “bum” or a “loser” or “average” or any of the other stupid and ill-fitting adjectives you haters use towards Dak because he fumbled and threw a stupid pass that should have put 6 on the board for NY. First of all, he’s rusty and secondly he doesn’t have to be perfect in order to garner appropriate praise proportional to his overall game. He drove us down the field for a FG and we won. Good game Dalton.
Notice YOUR response to Dak doing the exact same damn thing in the ATL game. You ignore the game winning FG that only happened because Dak shredded ATL’s defense and instead choose to focus on his mistakes earlier in the game and the fact that an onside kick recovery has a low probability, where as with Dalton you ignore the two significant mistakes he made, one of which erased our lead, and focus only on the positives he brought to the game.
That’s called being a “hater” which definitionally necessitates hypocrisy. You okay with that?
