Oh, I agree. Depending on how 1-21 play out, I could see scenarios where I'd be very happy with him being taken at #28.masomenos85;2043540 said:I'm not sure that's too far off base actually. However if we're drafting him at pick 28 or so I don't think it would be unrealistic for him to just project as a #2 CB. Hall was drafted around top 5 if I recall so obviously he's expected to be a shutdown #1. But I don't think we'd have so much invested in taking Talib that we would have to force him into that role if he couldn't handle it. I know whenever you take a player in the first you hope he can be THE guy, but really if he's starting and contributing at any position then you're doing alright.
I'd rather take a guy who I was confident in being able to be a #2 CB than take a guy like Jenkins or McKelvin who others are projecting as a #1 CB.
Honest question, why do you like Jenkins over Cason? Or Talib for that matter?ejthedj;2043728 said:Pretty much, as a Boys fan, You gotta pick either Talib or Jenkins and hope one of them is there at 22.
Or maybe Cason/Flowers. But of the 4--give me Jenkins. He seems like the one with the least ? marks
Other than the INTs, he had terrible college production. He was targeted too much. He gave up too many passes. And he gave up a ton of yardage and TDs.jobberone;2043753 said:Why isn't Porter higher on people's lists? He has the production but I don't know enough about him.
theogt;2043760 said:Other than the INTs, he had terrible college production. He was targeted too much. He gave up too many passes. And he gave up a ton of yardage and TDs.
theogt;2043760 said:Other than the INTs, he had terrible college production. He was targeted too much. He gave up too many passes. And he gave up a ton of yardage and TDs.
masomenos85;2043763 said:Yeah he allowed nearly a 60% completion rate and by far the highest QB rating against of the "big name" CBs. I think he had a below average rate of plays on the ball too. Porter is one of those I think we HAVE to stay away from.