Risen Star
Likes Collector
- Messages
- 89,471
- Reaction score
- 212,431
I'm expecting the suspension to end up being less and he's on the field vs. the Cowboys.
Once piece of evidence is that the persons accused of deflating balls actually admitted to deflating balls in text messages to one another. Then those same people offered up ridiculous stories to explain what are otherwise easily understandable texts.
I'm not sure that's the case. I think the court would only be determining whether the NFL had the authority to enforce the suspension, not engaging a fact finding endeavor.I agree but I would add that I don't see it going to court. If it goes to court, Brady risks having to turn over his texts and emails which will prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the whole thing came from him.
I keep seeing this thrown around but people don't understand why that phrasing was used. The "more probable than not" also known as a "preponderance of the evidence" is the wording used in civil cases. "Beyond a reasonable doubt" is used in criminal cases.
The league actually operated under the concept of "beyond a reasonable doubt" before Goodell changed the requirements "to preserve the competitive integrity of the league" and "maintain public confidence."
And he changed it because of the Patriots. After....get this...spygate.
here is another article about the fumbles
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/fivethirtyeight-dissects-the-deflategate-report/
I'm expecting the suspension to end up being less and he's on the field vs. the Cowboys.
I can't even imagine how pissed I'd be if my team lost a 1st and 4th round pick because of deflating footballs.
I can't even imagine how pissed I'd be if my team lost a 1st and 4th round pick because of deflating footballs.
haha free win vs the Pats... I'll take it
those telling me to read the report, no thanks, i dont have time or to be honest the inclination, hence the reason i asked what evidence do they have.
I hope this stops people crying about goodell being krafts puppet anyway.
It is an interesting correlational analysis.
But you would have to provide some additional support here - yes, the Pats fumble rate is unusually low. Is that due to deflated footballs? Is it due to having a coach who won't tolerate fumbles? Some combination of factors? We don't know
It is an interesting correlational analysis.
But you would have to provide some additional support here - yes, the Pats fumble rate is unusually low. Is that due to deflated footballs? Is it due to having a coach who won't tolerate fumbles? Some combination of factors? We don't know
I'm not sure that's the case. I think the court would only be determining whether the NFL had the authority to enforce the suspension, not engaging a fact finding endeavor.