Tommy Crowder

Banned_n_austin said:
Is it cool if we give Tommy Crowder some props in this thread?
Be my guess, Ben - the more the better.

It's a pity party, but not a funeral.
 
Nors said:
Crowder, Copper - not too be harsh but they are a dime a dozen long shot. Good story and all.

Me - Give me Peerless Price all day everyday over Crowder.
Last thing in the world I want to see is an injury and Copper/Crowder in my WR rotation.

I was trying to be gentle with this subject Nors, but what the hell.... when you're right, you're right.:D
 
Dallas4ever said:
I was trying to be gentle with this subject Nors, but what the hell.... when you're right, you're right.:D
Did it come down to Price OR Crowder?

I think not.

If Crowder had made the final 53, it would have been as a ST ace, not a receiver...

I doubt it ever came down to Bill mulling "Gee, should I sign Price, or should I play Crowder?"

No need to be 'gentle' btw ;)

We all know the player's current value to the team - it's the PS.
 
LaTunaNostra said:
baj1, I realize Tommy's appropriate place at this time is on the PS.

Bill seems to use his ps a little more on the churning side than the raw player development side..witness his conments on how you always want a developmental 'type', but near ready oline guy on the ps, but I hope he does see TC as something potentially very special.

No one wants to see another Randall Williams feeding from the trough for three years..but Tommy is more of a sheer 'football player' than RW ever was, or will be.

I have faith he'll be on the ps.

There oughta be room for his potential impact, as well as his speed.
Hey, I don't begrudge Randall Williams his spot either...he was a wonderful gunner on punts and kicks, and he did have that wonderful onsides kick return for a TD that sealed a win...I think we should have tried him on KO returns.

Crowder has the speed and ability, but he just didn't make plays yet...I sort of wonder why a guy with hands good enough to try out at WR and that type of speed wasn't tried at KO return where we really really suck.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,125
Messages
13,790,180
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top