VaqueroTD
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 8,804
- Reaction score
- 17,700
No, you walked into the offseason.Did I just walk into 2016?
No, you walked into the offseason.Did I just walk into 2016?
Yeah....must be hard fitting in NFL game starts into retirement schedule....I read parts of this post but not all, but it turned into a Romo vs. Dak, and as @Qcard always says, it's not about football.
All I know with Romo is I never felt we had a chance because I was always waiting for the goof up to Happen. And it usually did. He did make losing exciting though. With Dak I think he's regressed and last year's playoff game was worse than any playoff game Romo had. I hope he can be fixed but I have my doubts. It is his 8th year.
I thought Romo was a great QB. I believe he was always priority one for the opposition to stop. He seemed to have to carry and direct the offense mainly from the line of scrimmage. It appeared he was as much QB as offensive coordinator on game days and it was stressful seeing him down to the wire on the play clock trying to get them in the right call.
Had some real bonehead plays too. Overall, I thought he was a great player.
With injuries, Romo played the equivalent of 8 seasons total. He's still 25th all time in TDs Has more TD's than the likes of Jim Kelly and Steve Young, who played in pass happy offenses. Young played 14 years as did Dan Fouts, who's 22nd in TDs.Watching a football life... Romo sat for 3 years?!?
Agreed. Romo had a nice career statistically but he needed a smarter front office to win. Jerry was his usual pathetic self at that time. Every decision after Parcells was more ridiculous than the last but some don’t seem to think that played any part. You have to build and develop. That wasn’t happening at the time since the front office was clueless on how to do that. They weren’t just going to live off of what Parcells did... and unfortunately that’s how it unfolded.Honestly believe if he played for a real football organization he would have gone / won at least one superbowl if not more.
He morphed into an elite quarterback however was surronded by an after thought of a team. Especially the defense bar a year or two. Jerry was not concerned with building a team until it was to late. Think if he played two more years and stayed relatively healthy with all the pieces in place we would have sniffed a superbowl.
I think people forget how damn good he was. Did he make bone headed plays? Sure but some of those teams were complete trash. Very few quarterbacks at the time would have dragged those teams to 8-8 records.
That he did.Darren Woodson said he was the best of them all in his rookie season.
Yeah, your take on Romo has always been extreme in that regard.All I know with Romo is I never felt we had a chance because I was always waiting for the goof up to Happen. And it usually did. He did make losing exciting though. With Dak I think he's regressed and last year's playoff game was worse than any playoff game Romo had. I hope he can be fixed but I have my doubts. It is his 8th year.
Then came Garrett...clapping them hands.
i guess 2014 didnt happen....Dak had 3 all pros on the line in 2016 all in their prime plus the leagues leading rusher for the next 3 years, nothing EXACT about it. Romo's line was all 29 years old except for Flozell who was 32 back in 07 and Jerry's job from that point on was laughable.
I don't think Dak is capable, even if everything around him was somehow perfect. But worse is he lacks the desire and passion to get the job done. In other words, I don't think he gives a damn. He got paid and now he's on cruise control.With Romo you always had a chance, not the same with Dak. This team will not go anywhere till we have a new QB who's capable. It's the hard truth.
When he’s already 34? I guess the previous 6 years didn’t happen either. What did happen in those 6 years with the QB at the height of his career? Not much. Let me know when Dak has to deal with the special teams draft or the Roy Williams trade. Those are just some of the gems from Jerry during that period plus a whole slew more of stupid decisions.. don’t fool yourself!i guess 2014 didnt happen....
This is a mischaracterization based on a misunderstandingI loved Romo and I love Dak. They are having similar careers but rabid Romo lovers will tear down Dak to build up Romo. To be fair, it happens the other way around too. They will never forgive Dak for taking Romo's job. They root against Dak so Dak can be seen as a failure like Romo is. That's why you see the Romo hate.
I’m between both of you! I always thought we had a chance with Romo because he could pull out some amazing plays with nothing around him but did slightly dread when the one or two bad plays would finish us. It was a tight rope! It took me a few years to appreciate him more because he did a lot of it with zero Oline and less talent than many of our current rosters.Yeah, your take on Romo has always been extreme in that regard.
He led the entire league in late 4th-quarter, game-winning drives for his last 6 years.
Yet you worried more about the bad that could happen (and sometimes did happen) than the good that happened literally more than any other player in that situation.
Glass half-empty thing
As for Dak, I've always supported him in varying degrees. I see his limitations as well, but think he is better than some here give him credit for.
So I stay out of the bashing
I mean did he not bring in TO? Witten.. he was 34 and had his best season...again this "Tony never had good players" stuff is ridiculous..He never had a complete team THATS true same as Dak, but again if it doesnt line up with your side of the argument it doesnt matter..I AM A BIG ROMO FAN same as Dak but I'm not going to change history for it...When he’s already 34? I guess the previous 6 years didn’t happen either. What did happen in those 6 years with the QB at the height of his career? Not much. Let me know when Dak has to deal with the special teams draft or the Roy Williams trade. Those are just some of the gems from Jerry during that period plus a whole slew more of stupid decisions.. don’t fool yourself!
Why are you mentioning Witten? He was good sure...but I think their friendship had a LOT to do with their success. Not sure TO or Dez were necessarily good friends. it could be argued Witten is another example of Tony making, or having a LOT to do with... a receiver's success.I mean did he not bring in TO? Witten.. he was 34 and had his best season...again this "Tony never had good players" stuff is ridiculous..He never had a complete team THATS true same as Dak, but again if it doesnt line up with your side of the argument it doesnt matter..I AM A BIG ROMO FAN same as Dak but I'm not going to change history for it...