Really hate when we have to come up with subjective opinions on Cowboy greats of the past and current Cowboys. I don't bring stats into the equation as the sole reason because of different eras, rules, outdoor stadiums, team strengths at the time, etc........but anyone who says that Tony is more mobile or athletic than Roger is short sighted when it comes to Roger's skills-------heck he was a Heisman winner at NAVY......freaking Navy...and took a 5 year hiatus before his Cowboys career. I look at W-L and how their team played with them at the helm. Who cares which team had better players, did they play above their potential during that period? Did the QB bring out the best in that team? Did they actually win the BIG enchilada--which is synanomous to GREAT? A good/hot QB can actually win the SB once, look at Doug Williams, Trent Dilfer, Joe Freaking Flacco. It takes a GREAT QB to win multiple SBs.
Roger WON 2 SBs and could have won at least another if not for a Jackie Smith drop. In order for Tony to be in the conversation, he HAS to win at least 1, but probably 2 SBs. That's the cold hard fact. Come back after that and we can evaluate it further. Not taking anything from Tony, he has actually been great for an UDFA.
But going into the playoffs this year, we will finally see how he does. Its put up or shut up time. You want to be the Big Kahuna, its showtime.