PJCOWBOYS
New Member
- Messages
- 388
- Reaction score
- 0
My point is Bush was getting hype as the next Sayers and Sanders as the next great running back. I don't know how I can explain it any better. I have no problem with him getting all the attention for his receiving abilities or yards after the catch, but why then does the media overlook what he is doing running with the ball? Like I said, if Sanders or Sayers were doing this their rookie years, I doubt they would have gotten this type of media hype and they probably would have been benched. Bush was supposed to be this great runner. And the media still is talking about his wow factor and ignoring his ineptitude in regard to his rushing stats.
SaintReginald;1215582 said:you dont seem to understand the makeup of our team. We will have to agree to disagree on this but just fyi i think i made it clear that i wasnt questioning romo's talent or staying power. I was only questioning the media hype surrounding the past 6 games. Your acting as if i said romo was garbage and Saint Reggie was the supreme rushing RB in the league.
If you followed the hype over reggie anyway you would know he was mostly regarded as someone who was a big play threat on any down, and an amazing receiver out of the backfield. Someone who could create mismatches. Those things are true, and barring injury he will likely break the rookie receiving record (he needs 11 receptions)
Tony Romo has played very well and im not saying i doubt he will continue to do so. I'm just saying the media needs to slow down annointing new kings in all positions, on all teams. Do you agree with this?