Trade Austin?....

Gzus

Romosexual
Messages
1,257
Reaction score
2
OK it's something I heard while driving home on 105.3 The Fan, and it made me hot under the collar because of the stupidity of it. Just wanted to throw it out on the forums to be discussed.

Arnie Spanier their evenings host was discussing a story he had seen either on PFT or somewhere about why the Cowboys should end up trading Austin and how it would be better for them.

He reckoned that since the Boys already have Roy Williams and are paying him so much money that when they "tag" Austin and some other team comes around offering Austin $10 million a year then JJ can't justify paying Roy 9.5 and Austin 10, therefore letting Austin leave in exchange for two 1st rounders. Arnie argued that since we would then have 2 1st rounders this season and 1 the season after then it would work out because he threw out that we could replace Austin with Jordan Shipley from the 3rd round, and get Gerhart in the 2nd, and trade up to get Suh in the 1st with our 2 #1s.

When people called in to say this was an idiotic idea to get rid of such an impact player in Austin, Arnie reasoned that JJ sent Hershel Walker to Minnesota and that made such a huge difference.

My personal opinion:
Arnie is an idiot for thinking they should get rid of Austin for some picks.

1st off, Hershel Walker was going downhill when we fleeced the Vikings for all those picks. 2nd off the Boys when they traded Walker were a crappy team all around with needs everywhere, Boys now only need a few pieces no need to get rid of a vet for a bunch of rookies.

If anything we get rid of RW and not Austin. No way in HELL the Boys trade Austin b/c if they do they'll have a PR nightmare. You don't trade the guy who essentially saved your season (You don't discover a "Tom Brady" and then trade him away the next season for some picks).

What do ya'll think of this dumb plan.
 
Only way I consider it is if San Fransisco comes calling and offers their 12th and 14th picks in 2010 for him, but even then I ask for a 1st in 2011 aswell.


Now if we get 3 first round picks for him, I may consider it. More than likely no, a Miles Austin does not come around very often, even 3 above average players does not equal Miles. Miles is an ALL-PRO wide receiver
 
romoakatruebeast;3247265 said:
As much as I love those 2 first round picks, I cant get interested in it.

sorry
Yeah, after my post I just said, hell no.

I wouldn't trade Miles for picks 1-32 this year. He has to much potential, and he is too good right now.
 
My personal opinion:
Arnie is an idiot for thinking they should get rid of Austin for some picks.

Arnies job is to get ratings. Apparently by coming up with some really bad ideas and spewing over public air waves.
 
Romo 2 Austin;3247258 said:
Only way I consider it is if San Fransisco comes calling and offers their 12th and 14th picks in 2010 for him, but even then I ask for a 1st in 2011 aswell.
Honestly if it was that I would consider it as well cause that would result in us having 3 1st rounders in 2010 and 2 1st rounders in 2011 (making him worth more than Cutler). The flaw is that SF has Crabtree already so they have no need for a WR.
 
Gzus;3247287 said:
Honestly if it was that I would consider it as well cause that would result in us having 3 1st rounders in 2010 and 2 1st rounders in 2011 (making him worth more than Cutler). The flaw is that SF has Crabtree already so they have no need for a WR.

True- but that is the only offer that is at all possible that I would consider.
 
If we can get 2 first rounders for Austin i'm all for it. Also i believe if Austin got franchised he'd cost more than 10 mill.
 
DaBoys4Life;3247294 said:
If we can get 2 first rounders for Austin i'm all for it. Also i believe if Austin got franchised he'd cost more than 10 mill.

you've got to be kidding. Smiling is not a crime.
 
Romo 2 Austin;3247301 said:
you've got to be kidding. Smiling is not a crime.

It's not that I just really like extra draft picks. Theres only 3 players on this team i wouldn't trade for 2 first Romo Witten and Ware.
 
DaBoys4Life;3247338 said:
It's not that I just really like extra draft picks. Theres only 3 players on this team i wouldn't trade for 2 first Romo Witten and Ware.

Didnt you hate Ware and Romo like 3 days ago?
 
Hostile;3247351 said:
You can't trade Free Agents.
You can trade rights to RFAs which Austin will be. Cowboys have the right to match the offer and retain Austin or let him go to the other team for compensation of picks, which would be a 1st and a 3rd. If the Boys "tag" him then they can negotiate w/e trade compensation.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,004
Messages
14,505,873
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top