Trade Costa to Denver!

Teague31

Defender of the Star
Messages
18,221
Reaction score
22,842
Looks like Denver is going through what we did last year- they are already down their top two centers for the year and now playing a converted guard. You would think they are all in with peyton. We seem to have pretty good depth at the position all of a sudden (assuming Fred pans out). Would you trade Costa if you could get a 4th or 5th? We gave us a 7th for Cook last year and I think Costa is a little better. We could keep Cook and Mack for center depth. Anyhow, bored on a Sunday. What say you zoners?
 

Beats_By_Zeke

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,284
Reaction score
2,451
Um...no! We need as much online depth as possible. Besides. Fredrick may end playing guard.
Looks like Denver is going through what we did last year- they are already down their top two centers for the year and now playing a converted guard. You would think they are all in with peyton. We seem to have pretty good depth at the position all of a sudden (assuming Fred pans out). Would you trade Costa if you could get a 4th or 5th? We gave us a 7th for Cook last year and I think Costa is a little better. We could keep Cook and Mack for center depth. Anyhow, bored on a Sunday. What say you zoners?
.
 

TheSport78

The Excellence of Execution
Messages
10,396
Reaction score
3,674
I'd be okay with this only if Kowalski proves to be a solid G/C swing backup.
 

skinsscalper

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,146
Reaction score
5,693
At this point, to be honest, I'd rather hang on to Costa. And, believe me, there was a time when I NEVER thought i would have said that. With our luck with injuries lately, I'd feel better with Costa on the rosta (yes I'm a regular Dr. Suess today).
 

Hoofbite

Well-Known Member
Messages
40,868
Reaction score
11,569
We seem to have pretty good depth at the position all of a sudden (assuming Fred pans out).

What do you consider depth, just having a pulse?

Dallas doesn't have depth at C at all.

Costa is actually one of the better OL on the team. Sadly, it's not because he's so great but because the rest are that bad. Behind Tyron, who sticks out?
 

Teague31

Defender of the Star
Messages
18,221
Reaction score
22,842
What do you consider depth, just having a pulse?

Dallas doesn't have depth at C at all.

Costa is actually one of the better OL on the team. Sadly, it's not because he's so great but because the rest are that bad. Behind Tyron, who sticks out?

Cook is a serviceable center
Killer has played well there when called upon
A lot of folks think Mack is a better center than guard

So I think we do have decent depth at a position that's hard to get it
 

BrAinPaiNt

Mike Smith aka Backwoods Sexy
Staff member
Messages
78,654
Reaction score
42,998
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
For a third or above but nothing below a third.

IOW it is probably not happening so dont waste much time and energy on it. :)
 

birdwells1

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,837
Reaction score
4,074
Um...no! We need as much online depth as possible. Besides. Fredrick may end playing guard.

.
It depends on what they are offering. In this league everyone has a price or you're not doing your job as a GM.
 

LatinMind

iPhotoshop
Messages
17,458
Reaction score
11,571
Cook is a serviceable center
Killer has played well there when called upon
A lot of folks think Mack is a better center than guard

So I think we do have decent depth at a position that's hard to get it

I think u could see Kowalski traded.
 

FiveRings

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,782
Reaction score
247
I think u could see Kowalski traded.

No way, we're the only team that's high on him because we've watched him develop. To the rest of the NFL he's a no name backup interior lineman.

Plus, he's finally looking good, why deal him?
 
Top