Trade Romo?

[zrinkill]

Come on BB ..... when you have to play from behind its easy to put up bad stats.

You know that.

Romo is worlds better than anything we have had since Aikman.

 

[iceberg]

You appear to have your thumb on the scale.

Mac Engel:

Bill Parcells might have different expectations for Romo, above, because he's in his fourth NFL season, but Romo officially has returned from his trip to Fantasy Land.

What looked so easy in November was that difficult in December. He finished the final five games with a 77.1 passer rating, with six touchdown passes and eight interceptions, and he was sacked 13 times.

so you pick the part you wish to show as if it's the ONLY part to review? you appear to have your thumb up your arse.

not gonna get suckered into that type of stupidity, bb.

 

[MarkBrunell]

His rating of 76 in the last 4-5 games has hurt his stock a lot. He's been an absolute turnover machine during this month.

He'd net a mid 2nd and 4rth round pick

 

[CanadianCowboysFan]

What do yall think we can get for Romo, I think we can get a 1st....

Even if we could get a 1st, and we couldn't, who plays QB for us next year?

 

[iceberg]

Even if we could get a 1st, and we couldn't, who plays QB for us next year?

if you ask the (2) who really keep this junk alive, bledsoe or carter.

yea, commence hearty laughter now.

 

[bbgun]

come up with a new way to be a pain and we'll come up with new insults.

And then you'll be suspended. Win win. Haven't you heard? Insults are not allowed anymore, or so I've been assured. Bout time.

 

[iceberg]

And then you'll be suspended. Win win. Haven't you heard? Insults are not allowed anymore, or so I've been assured. Bout time.

then what about an insult to our intelligence with the stuff you're trying to pass off as "fact" or something that could even be real?

does that count?

 

[bbgun]

Come on BB ..... when you have to play from behind its easy to put up bad stats.

You know that.

Junk yards and stat padding. You don't get credit for torching the piss-poor Lions. Kitna took advantage of a weakness and so did Tony. Yes, he's had to make up for the D's recent ineptitude, but his own mistakes as well.

Romo is worlds better than anything we have had since Aikman.

Gee, I hope do, 'cause there's a lot of lost causes on that ignoble list.

 

[bbgun]

then what about an insult to our intelligence with the stuff you're trying to pass off as "fact" or something that could even be real?

does that count?

Just keep it to Tony's alleged trade value, kay? Not that difficult.

 

[zrinkill]

Gee, I hope do, 'cause there's a lot of lost causes on that ignoble list.

That I would agree with .....

and I defended each of them

 

[iceberg]

Just keep it to Tony's alleged trade value, kay? Not that difficult.

as soon as you start "keeping it real" - not at all difficult for those of us not just trying to slap crap around.

 

[McCordsville Cowboy]

Trade that scrub for a 1st rounder...

Trade up and get Brady Quinn....

Offer Charlie Weiss 50 Million Guarenteed..

Get Romeo Crennel to be you defensive coordinator..

And wait 3 years for Quinn to develop and by then Roy might weigh 255 lbs and with his new found weight, he becomes more of a vocal leader...

 

[bbgun]

as soon as you start "keeping it real" - not at all difficult for those of us not just trying to slap crap around.

Meaning what? Bowing and scraping before you? No thanks. I'm not saying the Boys should actively shop Tony. I'm saying they should listen if someone approaches them. You seemingly wouldn't trade him no matter what. Fine. But players with 10 games under their belt don't deserve that kind of deference.

I like Tony. I don't like the out-of-control idolatry.

 

[iceberg]

Meaning what? Bowing and scraping before you? No thanks. I'm not saying the Boys should actively shop Tony. I'm saying they should listen if someone approaches them. You seemingly wouldn't trade him no matter what. Fine. But players with 10 games under their belt don't deserve that kind of deference.

I like Tony. I don't like the out-of-control idolatry.

i'm not saying he's not untrade-able - BY ANY MEANS. but why spend 4 years grooming a QB, let him get his 1st year under his belt where most young players experience the biggest jump in learning and when we FINALLY after what, almost a decade of searching *trade* the 1st thing we've seen that looks like they can do the job?

i don't like the out of control idiotry either, i suppose.

 

[superpunk]

i'm not saying he's not untrade-able - BY ANY MEANS. but why spend 4 years grooming a QB, let him get his 1st year under his belt where most young players experience the biggest jump in learning and when we FINALLY after what, almost a decade of searching *trade* the 1st thing we've seen that looks like they can do the job?

i don't like the out of control idiotry either, i suppose.

I've just got to weigh in here.

It's the "idiocy" that's out of control. Not the "idiotry".

Carry on. :laugh2:

 

[iceberg]

I've just got to weigh in here.

It's the "idiocy" that's out of control. Not the "idiotry".

Carry on. :laugh2:

i was being (or trying to be) clever. : )

-1 to me.

 

[superpunk]

i was being (or trying to be) clever. : )

-1 to me.

I think your last post was great.

It's not the proposition that's ridiculous, and noone's indignant at the price suggested, as though it was too low to even be troubled with - it's the idea that we take all the progress made at the QB position (the first real progress in years, and home-grown to boot) and chuck it out the window.

It's like a Coakley thread, or something like that. Of course, the same people defending this thread would be in the Coakley thread laughing at the silly homers and their overestimation of Cowboys players - but only because the people defending this thread are so damn witty, original, and independent in their thinking.

Whatever.

 

[bbgun]

i'm not saying he's not untrade-able - BY ANY MEANS. but why spend 4 years grooming a QB, let him get his 1st year under his belt where most young players experience the biggest jump in learning and when we FINALLY after what, almost a decade of searching *trade* the 1st thing we've seen that looks like they can do the job?

Because maybe, just maybe there's someone out there they like more. Someone with better height or a stronger arm. Someone with better upside. Someone from a bigger program. Since they pick at #22, they won't have the dilemma of passing over a top QB prospect next April, meaning the job is Romo's for 2007. But I want to see a lot more from him before the idea of an extension is floated.

 

[burmafrd]

cannot believe this thread is still alive.

 

[bbgun]

cannot believe this thread is still alive.

Lady Bird Johnson, too.