Trashin playoff QB's subpar play does Dak no justice

408Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,785
Reaction score
6,219
You are beyond delusional. Put a better passer on the team we already have a Dallas advances to the NFC championship easily.

Dak is the worse type of QB to have in the playoffs. You believing that dak is the only teams bright spot tells me I shouldnt really take anything you say seriously!
The fact you think any other quartback would've won that game shows how utterly abysmal your thought process is. The defense was atrocious and allowed a tsunami to pass through. A sieve would've been more useful.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,529
Reaction score
36,658
Talib was in when Dak got the TD on the first series

Dak always gets his on the first series when it’s scripted and in this case, when Linehan got Cooper isolated one on one in the slot and Dak knew he was going there from the beginning. Outside of that when he doesn’t have the OC baby-sitting, he blows.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,529
Reaction score
36,658
Ummm, THAt happened to be the call played by tada vanillahan...ALL GAME. It's so good of you to leave out the parts that blow your argument apart....mt bet, Dak snuffed that play call and went with coop, then even AFTER winning the game, got his butt chwed for side stepping the OC... wanna place a bet on it? Of course, W will never hear that, but it goes without saying.

You mean the QB can’t see single, press coverage on the outside and actually go with Cooper? Linehan was calling that plenty, which is why Dak would throw that to guys like Hurns when it was scripted in the first series.

It’s a tad vanilla because Dak is a basic, vanilla QB. Cooper had to YELL to Dak to throw him the ball on a go route that they were sitting on. That’s how clueless Dak is..
 

keysersoze

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,336
Reaction score
2,004
Dak always gets his on the first series when it’s scripted and in this case, when Linehan got Cooper isolated one on one in the slot and Dak knew he was going there from the beginning. Outside of that when he doesn’t have the OC baby-sitting, he blows.
Dak is better in a two minute offense when he can spread the defense and move the pocket. As was Romo before him. It’s the babysitting that slows his game down and forces him to try to make the reads that are scripted instead of playing on instinct. This is a dumb *** statement.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,529
Reaction score
36,658
If it's so easy then why is Dak leading the league in game winning drives since he entered the league? Seriously he's so bad but why are his numbers at end of halves and 4th qtr/ OT so incredible? You're just blinded by hate, obviously. Even people who don't like Dak agree when the games on the line he does a damn good job of making it happen one way or another. He's got half the number of game winning drives as your beloved Romo in only 3 years.

It’s not that difficult when you got a RB dominating the LOS and wearing out defenses. Dak ‘leads’ the league in game winning drives because he sucks for three and a half quarters so bad that the scores are always that close in the first place. Case in point Seattle, Zeke rushed it six times on the game winning drive and Seattle front was totally defeated which is why when Linehan called the draw Collins as the Lead blocker ran about thirteen yards with a gaping hole before te touched the first defender, which was a DB, not even a LB or DL, for Dak to run through.

If he was actually good and clutch he’d have more than a total of two games all in 2016 where he could come back from, meaning two scorers. When he had to, then Dak worshippers like you blame the defense like you did against the Rams.

Congratulations for proving Dak is a game manager.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,529
Reaction score
36,658
Dak is better in a two minute offense when he can spread the defense and move the pocket. As was Romo before him. It’s the babysitting that slows his game down and forces him to try to make the reads that are scripted instead of playing on instinct. This is a dumb *** statement.

No Romo had clueless Garrett as his playcaller. In 2014 in Linehan’s first year he dominated the TOP leading this offense. Romo is a progression, pocket QB.

Dak is just a one read QB, like even Witten said.
 

keysersoze

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,336
Reaction score
2,004
No Romo had clueless Garrett as his playcaller. In 2014 in Linehan’s first year he dominated the TOP leading this offense. Romo is a progression, pocket QB.

Dak is just a one read QB, like even Witten said.
Romo evolved into a progression quarterback. He didn’t just come off the bench that way. It amazes me how you guys don’t realize that Dak in year 3 is ahead of Romo in the same stage because Romo was a practice squad and 2-3 string quarterback at this point. Dak was thrown into the fire immediately and has basically played up to his experience and draft status so far. Give him time to evolve as well. If he shows no progress after his rookie contract is up, then we need to look elsewhere. But let’s be honest. Linehan and Moore ain’t done Dak any favors. He’s been coached to play outside his strengths and has no true mentor as Romo had in Wilson as a personal coach. Dak is an intelligent man with a strong arm. Hopefully Kitna will come in and use his veteran experience to hone Dak’s skills and pay extra attention to the details of his footwork. In my opinion that’s his biggest flaw. Coaching and extensive film work will take care of the rest.
 

keysersoze

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,336
Reaction score
2,004
And condoning one while lambasting the other is extremely hypocritical.
You know that’s what The Good Ole’ Boy’s do. It’s inherent. They actually fault Dak for Romo retiring. Like Dak was supposed to say “ No Jerry. No Jason.. I don’t want to finish the season as the starting quarterback. Put Tony back in.” It’s insane how people think nowadays.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,529
Reaction score
36,658
Romo evolved into a progression quarterback. He didn’t just come off the bench that way. It amazes me how you guys don’t realize that Dak in year 3 is ahead of Romo in the same stage because Romo was a practice squad and 2-3 string quarterback at this point. Dak was thrown into the fire immediately and has basically played up to his experience and draft status so far. Give him time to evolve as well. If he shows no progress after his rookie contract is up, then we need to look elsewhere. But let’s be honest. Linehan and Moore ain’t done Dak any favors. He’s been coached to play outside his strengths and has no true mentor as Romo had in Wilson as a personal coach. Dak is an intelligent man with a strong arm. Hopefully Kitna will come in and use his veteran experience to hone Dak’s skills and pay extra attention to the details of his footwork. In my opinion that’s his biggest flaw. Coaching and extensive film work will take care of the rest.

Romo saved Parcells and a trash roster, while Dak walked into an all-pro line, whose all pro linemen had blocked together for at least three years and a running game built by Callahan to match and a generational RB at that. Romo was then saddled by an incompetent OC that had zero years of experience calling plays. Linehan on the other hand had decades of experience and had Romo a robbed catch away from the SB. Darren Woodson said as soon as Romo stepped on the practice field, the whole team knew he was the best QB.

Romo was a progression QB from the very beginning and his first full season starting shattered all sorts of Cowboys passing records.

Dak was not farther along than Romo, Dak stepped into the ideal situation. Linehan was the playcaller in Dak’s first season.
 

Romo_To_Dez

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,545
Reaction score
15,220
You know that’s what The Good Ole’ Boy’s do. It’s inherent. They actually fault Dak for Romo retiring. Like Dak was supposed to say “ No Jerry. No Jason.. I don’t want to finish the season as the starting quarterback. Put Tony back in.” It’s insane how people think nowadays.

Dak was supposed to have a different mentality than most NFL QBs, who wouldn't volunteer to bench themselves, especially in the middle of a hot winning streak. Most NFL QBs have a goal to start for a team and most aren't going to volunteer to give up a starting job once they get it.
 

keysersoze

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,336
Reaction score
2,004
Romo saved Parcells and a trash roster, while Dak walked into an all-pro line, whose all pro linemen had blocked together for at least three years and a running game built by Callahan to match and a generational RB at that. Romo was then saddled by an incompetent OC that had zero years of experience calling plays. Linehan on the other hand had decades of experience and had Romo a robbed catch away from the SB.

Darren Woodson said as soon as Romo stepped on the practice field, the whole team knew he was the best QB.

Romo was a progression QB from the very beginning and his first season stating shattered all sorts of passing records.

Dak was not farther along than Romo, Dak stepped into the ideal situation.
Stop it!!! Romo was not a progression quarterback from the start. He exclusively looked for TO who was arguably the best WR in the league. And when that fails he had none other than a Young Witten in his prime as a safety valve. Romo was just like Garrapolo and had a good showing due to being allowed to learn the game for years before playing and defensive coordinators having no film on him during his debut. Romo did not inherit a trash roster. He had a Hall of Fame WR and a Hall of Fame TE. Along with a Hall of Fame Coach. Stop the hypocrisy
 

408Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,785
Reaction score
6,219
Romo saved Parcells and a trash roster, while Dak walked into an all-pro line, whose all pro linemen had blocked together for at least three years and a running game built by Callahan to match and a generational RB at that. Romo was then saddled by an incompetent OC that had zero years of experience calling plays. Linehan on the other hand had decades of experience and had Romo a robbed catch away from the SB. Darren Woodson said as soon as Romo stepped on the practice field, the whole team knew he was the best QB.

Romo was a progression QB from the very beginning and his first full season starting shattered all sorts of Cowboys passing records.

Dak was not farther along than Romo, Dak stepped into the ideal situation. Linehan was the playcaller in Dak’s first season.
I love the ideal situation argument. Romo road the bench and worked his *** off for a few years before he got to start. Could you imagine the train wreck he most likely would've been without that? Seems to me it was the ideal situation for him. Especially after hearing him and Parcells talk about it during Romo's A Football Life episode.
 

keysersoze

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,336
Reaction score
2,004
Dak was supposed to have a different mentality than most NFL QBs, who wouldn't volunteer to bench themselves, especially in the middle of a hot winning streak. Most NFL QBs have a goal to start for a team and most aren't going to volunteer to give up a starting job once they get it.
Yea. Isn’t it amazing how immensely ignorant these folks’ thought process is??? This bs is way out.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,529
Reaction score
36,658
Stop it!!! Romo was not a progression quarterback from the start. He exclusively looked for TO who was arguably the best WR in the league. And when that fails he had none other than a Young Witten in his prime as a safety valve. Romo was just like Garrapolo and had a good showing due to being allowed to learn the game for years before playing and defensive coordinators having no film on him during his debut. Romo did not inherit a trash roster. He had a Hall of Fame WR and a Hall of Fame TE. Along with a Hall of Fame Coach. Stop the hypocrisy

Why don’t you tell Darren Woodson to stop it when he said as soon as Romo stepped on the football field he was the best QB.

Please explain Patrick Crayton’s success with Romo then if all Romo did was look to TO and then Witten..

Please explain why three of the four linemen that suddenly became pro bowlers with Romo were starting on this team with Bledsoe and gave up a whopping 40 plus sacks in 2005 the year Flozell went down. Please explain why Leonard Davis who was a bust for like four years in Arizona suddenly became a pro bowler with Romo?

Please tell me how Garrett was a HOF coach when he had two years of experience as a QB coach before he got handed the keys to this offense?
 
Last edited:

keysersoze

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,336
Reaction score
2,004
I love the ideal situation argument. Romo road the bench and worked his *** off for a few years before he got to start. Could you imagine the train wreck he most likely would've been without that? Seems to me it was the ideal situation for him. Especially after hearing him and Parcells talk about it during Romo's A Football Life episode.
Romo would’ve been carted off with injuries had he started as a rookie. No two ways around it.
 

keysersoze

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,336
Reaction score
2,004
Why don’t you tell Darren Woodson to stop it when he said as soon as Romo stepped on the football field he was a progression QB.

Please explain Patrick Crayton’s success with Romo then if all Romo did was look to TO and then Witten..
Crayton benefited because TO was double and sometimes triple teamed. Next question
 

408Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,785
Reaction score
6,219
Why don’t you tell Darren Woodson to stop it when he said as soon as Romo stepped on the football field he was a progression QB.

Please explain Patrick Crayton’s success with Romo then if all Romo did was look to TO and then Witten..
Woodson actually used the term "progression quarterback"? I haven't heard that one before.
 
Top