Wouldn’t hurt.Rush is the only QB there to compete with Lance. Do you think they should sign someone else to throw in the mix for the backup spot?
LOL.....Commical response. Now do the 2nd half when the game was over and they could play prevent defense with a 5 score lead. Wow commical.Now do the 2nd half.
To be fair, the game was over by halftime. Therefore the 2nd half stats don't carry much weight. Had the Packers played their first string the entire half (like they did the first half) then it would be a more fair comparison. And that isn't taking into consideration they played defense differently in the 2nd half (with a big lead) than the first half.Now do the 2nd half.
And after GB pulled some of their starters. lolLOL.....Commical response. Now do the 2nd half when the game was over and they could play prevent defense with a 5 score lead. Wow commical.
Yes, he doesn't have as strong of an arm that most GMs want.And there’s a reason no one picked him up after we released him last summer before re-signing him
Sorry, but you’re completely lost if you think he outplayed Dak and that he’s better than Dak. Not even going to bother wasting any more time with this. lolYes, he doesn't have as strong of an arm that most GMs want.
But he still outplayed Dak, and is better than Dak. Why? Because he performs under pressure and knows what the job of a quarterback is.
Even with a weaker arm, he still outplayed Dak and went 5-1- and should have been 6-0 if Gallup had tried.
Dak neither understands his job nor does he perform under pressure.
Wins are not and never have been a QB stat. Its the 70IQ football take from people who do not know enough to explain what is happening. Everyone with any ability to judge football watched those games and realized QB was the weak link. It is the primary reason they lost to the Eagles in that 5th games and having better QB play is certainly the primary reason they won the rematch. If winning was a QB stat Tim Tebow would have had a job.Yes, he doesn't have as strong of an arm that most GMs want.
But he still outplayed Dak, and is better than Dak. Why? Because he performs under pressure and knows what the job of a quarterback is.
Even with a weaker arm, he still outplayed Dak and went 5-1- and should have been 6-0 if Gallup had tried.
Dak neither understands his job nor does he perform under pressure.
Dak is the weak link of the Cowboys, and it shows every year when the Cowboys play any team that punches back.Wins are not and never have been a QB stat. Its the 70IQ football take from people who do not know enough to explain what is happening. Everyone with any ability to judge football watched those games and realized QB was the weak link. It is the primary reason they lost to the Eagles in that 5th games and having better QB play is certainly the primary reason they won the rematch. If winning was a QB stat Tim Tebow would have had a job.
Yeah, it's over your head.Sorry, but you’re completely lost if you think he outplayed Dak and that he’s better than Dak. Not even going to bother wasting any more time with this. lol
I mean I showed proof of the opposite and your only recourse seems to be play to cover your ears and eyes and pretend that reality did not happen the way it did.Dak is the weak link of the Cowboys, and it shows every year when the Cowboys play any team that punches back.
When Rush played, the Cowboys didn't have that weakness, and the team was stronger.
Deny it all you want; the proof is that Dak is the reason the Cowboys fail every season, and everyone-even you- knows it.
You’re lost.Yeah, it's over your head.
But even you know the Cowboys were a better team with Cooper Rush at quarterback.
So your are saying Jerry, McCarthy, OC and QB coach are all incompetent for playing Dake over Rush???Yes, he doesn't have as strong of an arm that most GMs want.
But he still outplayed Dak, and is better than Dak. Why? Because he performs under pressure and knows what the job of a quarterback is.
Even with a weaker arm, he still outplayed Dak and went 5-1- and should have been 6-0 if Gallup had tried.
Dak neither understands his job nor does he perform under pressure.
HahahaThe entire team was better with Rush as the starter.
That's not a coincidence.
Yes.So your are saying Jerry, McCarthy, OC and QB coach are all incompetent for playing Dake over Rush???
Love it!!!Yes.
Our defense and special teams were better with Rush at QB???The entire team was better with Rush as the starter.
That's not a coincidence.
Yes.Our defense and special teams were better with Rush at QB???
Hahaha....... all of a sudden with Rush at QB it is a team sport.Yes.
Rush moved the offense and actually took time off of the clock consistently, keeping the defense fresh and making them better.
It's a team sport, but if you have one player not doing his job and turning the ball over, it brings the entire team down.