Rush is the only QB there to compete with Lance. Do you think they should sign someone else to throw in the mix for the backup spot?They have their sights set that low for him? That is unfortunate.
The entire team was better with Rush as the starter.The fairy tale universe you guys live in is weird.
I do remember watching Rush completely dominate the Eagles, who made the Super Bowl that year, so there might be something to… oh wait Dak was the QB when that happened. How did this “better” version of the Cowboys do, specifically Rush, in that other game against the Eagles?The entire team was better with Rush as the starter.
That's not a coincidence.
No. This is what's wrong with our delusional fan base.This is what is wrong with this clown organization. Lance should be competing with Dak for #1. Don’t extend Dak I have a good feeling that Lance with this offensive system will thrive.
The defense and running game was better. Was that because of Rush? Are you saying we would have a better chance of winning a Super Bowl with him? We had very little passing game with him. In six games he only threw 5 TD passes. In his last two starts combined he had less than 200 yards passing. He only had 102 yards passing in the win over the Rams because our defense played lights out and we ran the ball. We were limited with him offensively and once Dak returned we became the highest scoring offense in the league. Those of you who act like Cooper Rush is a better QB than Dak are being ridiculous.The entire team was better with Rush as the starter.
That's not a coincidence.
The team had a more balanced approach with Rush because he did what a quarterback is supposed to do, and that took pressure off of the defense.The defense and running game was better. Was that because of Rush? Are you saying we would have a better chance of winning a Super Bowl with him? We had very little passing game with him. In six games he only threw 5 TD passes. In his last two starts combined he had less than 200 yards passing. He only had 102 yards passing in the win over the Rams because our defense played lights out and we ran the ball. We were limited with him offensively and once Dak returned we became the highest scoring offense in the league. Those of you who act like Cooper Rush is a better QB than Dak are being ridiculous.
You saw what you wanted to see. You didn't see Rush lead the Cowboys to five wins and even in the loss to the Eagles in Philadelphia he led them back despite McCarthy refusing to dispute bad calls and Gallup stepping aside for Philly defenders.I do remember watching Rush completely dominate the Eagles, who made the Super Bowl that year, so there might be something to… oh wait Dak was the QB when that happened. How did this “better” version of the Cowboys do, specifically Rush, in that other game against the Eagles?
The only chance we had to win with him is to run the ball and play great defense. Our pass rush was on pace to break the 84 Bears sack record. We were winning games with our defense and kicker. Maher made 14 FG’s during those 5 wins. He made 4 FG’s against Washington, because we couldn’t score TDs. We didn’t give up more than 17 points in any of the wins we had with Rush. Are you saying you would rather have Cooper Rush as our starting QB?The team had a more balanced approach with Rush because he did what a quarterback is supposed to do, and that took pressure off of the defense.
No I saw an honest analysis of how he played. I know there is the 70IQ football take of "wins are a QB stat" for simpletons who do not understand how games are won and lost. Also Rush was the reason they were in trouble. Let me remind you his statline because it was truly putrid on every level and his play was worse than that. He was 18-38 (47% completion) 181 yards 1TD 3 INTs. That is an abomination of a football game by any metric and it was worse than the stats showed. That is the reason they lost. The defense was very good but Rush was simply not good enough. Then, despite the defense being worse in the rematch, Dak managed to overcome that by having a significantly better game. Against the exact same defense Dak was 27-35 347 yards 3TDs 1 INT. Unless you are an Eagles fan, Dak was by far the better of those 2 QBs for the Cowboys.You saw what you wanted to see. You didn't see Rush lead the Cowboys to five wins and even in the loss to the Eagles in Philadelphia he led them back despite McCarthy refusing to dispute bad calls and Gallup stepping aside for Philly defenders.
You didn't want to see that because it made your hero look bad.
There is a reason why Rush has been a career backup.Those of you who act like Cooper Rush is a better QB than Dak are being ridiculous.
And there’s a reason no one picked him up after we released him last summer before re-signing himThere is a reason why Rush has been a career backup.
Better than the nfl leader in tds and percentage?
Ouch! And that one td was right after the green bay packer linebacker dropped a wide open int in the endzone LOL. The best!!!
Why? So you can drool over losing stats?Now do the 2nd half.
Cannot say no. Or yes. Simply can't know that either way because you can't know the situation that a given team finds itself in.The only value he has is if some loses their backup for the season and wants a cheap fill in. Nobody is going to bring him in to start.
I'll just let the losers complain and say ridiculous stuff.Why? So you can drool over losing stats?
Well, then go say it, but don't post it here, ok?I'll just let the losers complain and say ridiculous stuff.
Is it even possible for you to have a discussion that is not about other fans?I'll just let the losers complain and say ridiculous stuff.