Yeah, but looking at one worst case scenario doesn't prove anything. Bad drafting is bad drafting no matter where you pick.
Look at last year's draft, for example. Chase Young. 2nd pick in the draft. Ultra stud. Soooooooo, who's the next best DE? Chaisson? Epensa? There is a chasm of difference. So, in saying draft position isn't that important, you'd have to agree that Chaisson/Epensa are just as good as Chase Young.
I didn't say draft position wasn't important, I said just being down a few spots doesn't automatically mean you can't improve your team.
What about players like Brady? Kamara? Those guys weren't anywhere near first round picks. Didn't hurt the Saints that they didn't have the top pick, still did great.
And so what if Young is much better than Chaisson? Do the Cowboys just need a safety and it's "off to the races"? My point is that if the Cowboys can't get the stud DE or S then there are MANY other players they can get that can result in a much improved team. I just don't like the notion that if you draft a few spots farther down you're doomed to miss out on a great player. And I'm just noting one possible worst case scenario, for an example. And what about Claiborne? 6th overall pick, and he never panned out, mostly due to injuries but the end result is the same, didn't get first round production from a first round pick. What if the Cowboys tanked to get him? Bucs passed on Dorsett and got Bell, who worked out better? 16 teams passed on Emmitt, think they maybe some didn't regret doing so?
Hope\ we all realize that drafting and setting up a team isn't a formula thing, it's way more complicated than that...