Doomsday101
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 107,812
- Reaction score
- 39,106
Philly ran the ball well at times but also played with great field position for much of the game.
I suggested last week that we try to trade for a DT and I was ridiculed
Didnt matter because on the biggest drive of the game when we needed the stop, Quinn played his Super Bowl winning strategy that worked wonders against the Patriots!
KM going pass crazy when Rush was obviously out of sorts was absolutely on KM.
Penalties reared their ugly head tonite too
Haters gonna hate........
This is the correct answer. If we woulda just brought pressure on those 3rd downs there is no way they get all 4. Idk why we ever play Parsons off the line of scrimmage. He causes to much havoc when he’s on it.Dan Quinn lost his balls and ability to make adjustments!
1. We still cannot stop the run.
2. Rush has no arm.
Not complicated, but we won't go anywhere until that is fixed.
That one play they ran 3 times and I think they scored twice on it had Parsons in a bad spot. He can't cover the QB run and WR/TE going out in a route.
I'm confident next time they play Quinn will get that fixed
People see what they want . Eagles got a big run stuffing DT in the first round. He was double teamed and pushed out of the hole many times.
NBC won't show you that, because Colinsworth would be suicidal but go look yourself.
You need great LB play with better talent at DT, to be a true run stuffing team
Dallas ran 26 times for 135 yards 5.2 YPC
Philly ran 39 times for 135 yards 3.5 YPC
Philly had 139 yards on 39 carries.
Cowboys had 134 yards on 26 carries.
Who was more effective stopping the run? Not perfect, but I will take it after all the BS I heard about the Philly running game.
Cowboys had more passing yards...181-151.
Top rusher in the game was Eliott
Top receiver was Lamb
And Turpin had nearly 100 return yards.
The difference.....you are right.....Rush.......no arm, no velocity....3 interceptions and short field.
As I looked over these stats, I was simply amazed. The Fegals will lose next time to us.
Philly had 139 yards on 39 carries.
Cowboys had 134 yards on 26 carries.
Who was more effective stopping the run? Not perfect, but I will take it after all the BS I heard about the Philly running game.
Cowboys had more passing yards...181-151.
Top rusher in the game was Eliott
Top receiver was Lamb
And Turpin had nearly 100 return yards.
The difference.....you are right.....Rush.......no arm, no velocity....3 interceptions and short field.
As I looked over these stats, I was simply amazed. The Fegals will lose next time to us.
And with the game on the line, the Eagles lined up and ground us into the turf in the 4th Q.
Sure and they had less than 5 yards of offence in the 3rd quarter. They do have a good team, but to put this on our inability to stop the run is ridiculous.
1. We still cannot stop the run.
2. Rush has no arm.
Not complicated, but we won't go anywhere until that is fixed.