I'm not sure I understand the criticism though. We're they intercepted? Then why are we discussing easily interceptable balls? If the defended doesn't get it and we make the play that's a good thing yes?
People here said same things about rush having 3 balls that could have been Int.
also they complained about only scoring 17 points a game, and thats all dak would have had if not for defense getting the late turnovers.
So to me dak was about the same as rush in that game, and it was against a lesser team than rush was playing.
Detroit did play a good def game though, better than they had been doing.
so what I wonder, is the rust off now?? does dak need 1 or 2 more games? who knows.
It was a win, so move on to next game, but dak was not the great qb or much improvement over rush that many expected.
But he did ok, and that was good enough to win.
I think had detroit scored the td instead of fumbling at the one, or if they could /would have challenged the previous td play, the game might
have turned out different. I think they gave up after that fumble.