I'm critically of Romo because he frustrates me because he has such dumb moments for a guy with so much skill. I've seen Romo have games that even the golden boy Andrew Luck couldn't duplicate. But then I've seen him make plays that Mark Sanchez would know better to make. But, in all fairness, I can't say whether or not Romo should be compared to the elite QBs because he hasn't had a good enough team around him to have the kind of success they've had.
All in all, it MIGHT be Romo's fault, but we'll never know until we give him a good enough team to prove himself.
unrealistic cowboy fans think Romo (especially at his age) can win us a Super Bowl.. despite having one playoff win in 8 years.
Romo is not the only reason that the Cowboys haven't won a Super Bowl, but he will give a couple of games away every year .
As Belichick once said (and Staubach and Aikman, etc,etc) fans like that are a great football IQ filter.
End the conversation when they go there because it's like looking at an idiot spouting the n word 100 times or like someone who thinks we never went to the moon...etc.
Not worth your time.
Romo is not the only reason that the Cowboys haven't won a Super Bowl, but he will give a couple of games away every year .
He has been on some good teams that didn't accomplish anything.
I'm tired of running into "Cowboys fans" who immediately tell me that "For the Cowboys to win, they need to dump Romo."
Stats should not even be needed, you have to be looking at a really small picture and have a really short memory to come to that answer. You either are brainwashed by the Ed Werder's of the world or you JUST became a fan in 2007.
I have a hard time believing you watch every game and know the team. I ran into another "Boys fan" today and he blurted this out immediately and when I disagreed it was as if he thought Im the ONLY Romo believer left. At the same time this guy couldn't tell me 5 guys names on defense outside Lee.
Have we already forgotten what it is like living without a QB that can consistently put the ball in the endzone? I remember being thrilled the first time Bledsoe threw 300 yards.
I'm critically of Romo because he frustrates me because he has such dumb moments for a guy with so much skill. I've seen Romo have games that even the golden boy Andrew Luck couldn't duplicate. But then I've seen him make plays that Mark Sanchez would know better to make. But, in all fairness, I can't say whether or not Romo should be compared to the elite QBs because he hasn't had a good enough team around him to have the kind of success they've had.
All in all, it MIGHT be Romo's fault, but we'll never know until we give him a good enough team to prove himself.
I'm tired of running into "Cowboys fans" who immediately tell me that "For the Cowboys to win, they need to dump Romo."
Stats should not even be needed, you have to be looking at a really small picture and have a really short memory to come to that answer. You either are brainwashed by the Ed Werder's of the world or you JUST became a fan in 2007.
I have a hard time believing you watch every game and know the team. I ran into another "Boys fan" today and he blurted this out immediately and when I disagreed it was as if he thought Im the ONLY Romo believer left. At the same time this guy couldn't tell me 5 guys names on defense outside Lee.
Have we already forgotten what it is like living without a QB that can consistently put the ball in the endzone? I remember being thrilled the first time Bledsoe threw 300 yards.
Wake up. He wins more games than he loses. It is not fair for a quarterback who has to run for his life on every passing play to accomplish Brady Manning feats. But guess what he is near them anyhow.
The same story the past 3 years, win and go home in the last week and Romo folds.
What good is a an if he can't get you 9 wins in a crappy division? The same story the past 3 years, win and go home in the last week and Romo folds. The reason why people say we need to get rid of Romo is due to the fact he hasn't done enough or make headlines in those go home games. I know Romo is not a Brady but he is too inconsistent to win a sb with. People feel we would be better off looking for a qb that has talent to replace him. I can understand the arguments if Romo never won a sb but dude he can't lead this team into the playoffs...so why so high on the guy?