The scoring or points were what I took from your comment about the second nthe defense gives up points. Which is why I said you made a conclusion you might not have meant to.
My conclusion was simply that football is a team sport. It is narrow-minded to state that one person loses any given game. Sure, some may own more responsibility than others, but ultimately, the onus falls on the entire team...Defense, Offense, Special Teams - they are all culpable in a loss. I'm not going to engage in a discussion that attempts to weigh said responsibility; that, in my mind, is a waste of time and energy. But I do take issue with a person making blanket statements such as: "Romo can't win 9 games," as though he is a tennis player, where that statement would actually make sense. I use to be a much more passionate Romo-defender, but over the years, I have backed away from most discussion's, because to a certain degree, many of the arguments have merit. The aforementioned, however, does not.
Here is my argument against Romo: He doesn't have the same arm strength or deep accuracy he used to and at his age he's not going to get that back. He is not nearly as elusive as he used to be and for the same age reason, that won't come back either. Finally, while there is no tangible data to back this statement up, I honestly think marriage life and fatherhood as cooled his competitor's fire...and barring divorce, I don't see that coming back - not that I would wish that on him...I wish him all the best in that regard. It is for that reason, that I am ready for the next QB, even if that means we have to go through growing-pains to develop the next Cowboys QB. That is also why I take issue with some of the ignorance that is spouted off about him losing games. If you think he is bad, just wait for life without Romo. It will get worse before it get's better. And I'd hate for these same Romo-haters to start calling for the next QB because life with Romo has rendered them spoiled and without patience.