Up until now I have steered clear of the Roy Williams debate...

Cochese

Benched
Messages
7,360
Reaction score
0
stealth;1900724 said:
He is still top 10 SS in the entire league, dont be ********, everyone expected the moon and got less than that and wants to throw him under the bus.

Guess how many players on the team actually have lived up to the draft position expectations, be it for the positive or the negative. Roy will and should retire as a cowboy. This crap is getting old. We lost, its all roy's fault.


Why should he retire as a Cowboy? What has he done recently? 1 tackle in the biggest game of the year. I dont really believe that he has defenders today.
 

Bleu Star

Bye Felicia!
Messages
33,925
Reaction score
19,920
stealth;1900724 said:
This crap is getting old. We lost, its all roy's fault.

Nah. It's not all Roy's fault man. However, his new act is getting very old.
 

Cowboyz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,117
Reaction score
10,015
utrunner07;1900601 said:
not sure its really a debate any more

Sadly, for some, it's still a debate.

If form holds, tomorrow someone will come in here with TIVO "breakdown" of Roy's play and start espousing his stats and gibberish about how Roy actually played very well. (I guess it's too hard to actually watch a game with a nose buried in a stat book or a football almanac.)

Then, you'll have said poster's fan club coming in here praising the poster, his infallible stats, and of course, Roy's play, while telling the rest of us that we're idiots and don't understand football.

You can bank on it.
 

Mr Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,612
Reaction score
32,654
I'm all for Roy retiring as a Cowboy, as long as it happens this off season.
 

Kangaroo

Active Member
Messages
9,893
Reaction score
1
utrunner07;1900601 said:
not sure its really a debate any more...more of how do we get rid of him now

Can not for at least a year or 2 does not mean we have to start him
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,483
The point is he has become a NON-FACTOR in games, when he was suppose to be the super-star. Even Jerry said that part of the reason they brought in Wade was to cater to Roy's specific talents. Sadly, he no longer has any talent to cater to. He has been non-existent this whole year, and he has had no big plays.

He just fills a roster spot like any other average SS in the league.

The guy has become a cry-baby, making excuses for his play, and even when he admits it's his fault, it is a holier-than-thou admittance as if it happens only rarely.. And if it is because of Kelly Rowland, than he is a whuss, and all the more reason to cut him. Because if a girl can get in his head this much, it's not wonder he's now curling up, not trying to make the big-hit any more... it's no wonder he's worried about 'extending his career' to prevent injury...
 

UVAwahoos

Benched
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
0
All we can hope is that a dumb GM sees that he's "all-pro" and has made the pro bowl and decides to give us a good package of players for him. Perhaps a Matt Millen type would straight him straight up for the other Roy.
 

SDogo

Not as good as I once was but as good once as I ev
Messages
13,900
Reaction score
6
It's not even that he is just a liability in the passing game, he is now a liability no matter the down or situation.
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,823
Reaction score
112,687
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
rangers71;1900719 said:
Just sit his *** on the bench if we can't cut him. I mean the killer is better than him.
I'm not defending Roy. But Killer Davis is NOT better. Go check the tape.
 

stealth

Benched
Messages
4,882
Reaction score
0
JustSayNotoTO;1900732 said:
Why should he retire as a Cowboy? What has he done recently? 1 tackle in the biggest game of the year. I dont really believe that he has defenders today.


why, cause you can point to a play or a game where he didn't do enough to prove your bias wrong?
What about the good coverages he had today?
What about his supposed bad angle on a tackle today where his own man tripped him up and two other guys missed?

he isn't ronnie lott, so what, he is a damned good football player.
 

Cochese

Benched
Messages
7,360
Reaction score
0
stealth;1900842 said:
why, cause you can point to a play or a game where he didn't do enough to prove your bias wrong?
What about the good coverages he had today?
What about his supposed bad angle on a tackle today where his own man tripped him up and two other guys missed?

he isn't ronnie lott, so what, he is a damned good football player.


A damned good football player that makes 1 tackle?
 

trickblue

Not Old School...Old Testament...
Messages
31,439
Reaction score
3,961
stealth;1900724 said:
He is still top 10 SS in the entire league, dont be ********, everyone expected the moon and got less than that and wants to throw him under the bus.

Guess how many players on the team actually have lived up to the draft position expectations, be it for the positive or the negative. Roy will and should retire as a cowboy. This crap is getting old. We lost, its all roy's fault.

I haven't taken a position on this for a while, but he is a DEFINITE liability...

I would package him on draft day for what I can get. If he remains on this team he will be a "hurt feelings" liability...

He flat out has to go. He has been bad for three years now...

How many times do we have to hear how teams plan to isolate him to realize it?

They telegraph it, then do it...

Take a box of kleenex and some burn relief medicine for him...
 

ScipioCowboy

More than meets the eye.
Messages
25,266
Reaction score
17,597
stealth;1900724 said:
He is still top 10 SS in the entire league, dont be ********, everyone expected the moon

I wasn't expecting the moon.

I was only expecting a player who wasn't such a liability in coverage that no scheme was capable of hiding his deficiencies. After all, Roy is a safety, right?

I was only expecting a player who was capable of preventing a first down conversion when he contacts his opponent a yard shy of the first down marker. After all, Roy's alleged strength is his tackling ability, right?

Am I really expecting the moon here? Is it so unreasonable to expect a saftey to provide adequate coverage (even if coverage isn't his forte) and sure tackling (when he's supposed to excel at tackling)?
 

UVAwahoos

Benched
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
0
stealth;1900842 said:
why, cause you can point to a play or a game where he didn't do enough to prove your bias wrong?
What about the good coverages he had today?
What about his supposed bad angle on a tackle today where his own man tripped him up and two other guys missed?

he isn't ronnie lott, so what, he is a damned good football player.

This guy has a lot of the same qualities that we need to look for in a GM in order to dump Roy off for some good players in return. It can happen
 

mannt88

Member
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
If I recall right Roy haven't been the same since we let go Aron Glenn.

He really sucks.
 

CowboyChris

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,511
Reaction score
4,961
CaptainAmerica;1900660 said:
He doesn't want to get hurt. That's exactly the way he plays! When a player loses his heart for the game and is just collecting a paycheck this is the kind of performance you get.

i couldnt agree anymore, the man cant cover, and cant tackle unless he is dragging someone from behind. we need to keep Hamlin though.
 

LarryCanadian

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,815
Reaction score
382
There were a couple of plays where Roy didn't show up much on camera, but he didn't do well on also:

1. The Toomer long TD, he took a questionable angle getting to Toomer and then slipped and whiffed on him, not coming close.

2. Canty made a nice play batting down a ball, but Roy was way behind his guy, trying to cover him running across the middle. Would have been a good gain.

When I saw Roy blitz he didn't get much penetration although he had a big guy on him each time.

Somehow on all the pass plays in the middle, the ball seems to go over Roy's head into a receiver hands who is covered by Reeves. Time after time. Seems he should be farther forward, or deeper back, or that QBs just know how to drop it in there on us.

I don't get it. I don't think the coaches have the answer either?

LarryCanadian
 

IndianaCowboyFan

The Bullet
Messages
852
Reaction score
0
CaptainAmerica;1900660 said:
He doesn't want to get hurt. That's exactly the way he plays! When a player loses his heart for the game and is just collecting a paycheck this is the kind of performance you get.

I have to admit I have been thinking the same thing. Years ago he was the center of highlight films. I cannot think of 1 single play this year that made me say wow.
 

stealth

Benched
Messages
4,882
Reaction score
0
trickblue;1900872 said:
I haven't taken a position on this for a while, but he is a DEFINITE liability...

I would package him on draft day for what I can get. If he remains on this team he will be a "hurt feelings" liability...

He flat out has to go. He has been bad for three years now...

How many times do we have to hear how teams plan to isolate him to realize it?

They telegraph it, then do it...

Take a box of kleenex and some burn relief medicine for him...


a quandry, say we do get rid of him and put a guy pack there that can play the pass like an animal. Then, teams run the ball down our throats, what then? Roy is a good to great overall player, the coaches believe he can play one on one with extremely huge and very athletic TEs in the league and people want a miracle. I just don't see the argument against him, there is next to no chance we could sign someone better as a whole.
 

stealth

Benched
Messages
4,882
Reaction score
0
LarryCanadian;1900986 said:
There were a couple of plays where Roy didn't show up much on camera, but he didn't do well on also:

1. The Toomer long TD, he took a questionable angle getting to Toomer and then slipped and whiffed on him, not coming close.

2. Canty made a nice play batting down a ball, but Roy was way behind his guy, trying to cover him running across the middle. Would have been a good gain.

When I saw Roy blitz he didn't get much penetration although he had a big guy on him each time.

Somehow on all the pass plays in the middle, the ball seems to go over Roy's head into a receiver hands who is covered by Reeves. Time after time. Seems he should be farther forward, or deeper back, or that QBs just know how to drop it in there on us.

I don't get it. I don't think the coaches have the answer either?

LarryCanadian


he tripped over another player, that isn't slipping.
 
Top