- Messages
- 58,971
- Reaction score
- 60,826
Has this been mentioned at all? How come we didn't tender him @ $2 million (with a 2nd round tender) and if another team signs him, we had the right to match and if we didn't, then would be receiving a 2nd pick in the process....
I love Bailey, but this would have seemed to make more sense. Am I missing something?
That would have been a reasonable way to go. I don't really care how you cut it, quality guys get paid market rate when they come up. The only question is, do you want to keep them, or not. For Bailey to sign a new deal that only makes him the 5th highest paid kicker in the league (depending how that number was calculated), we're getting a deal from the player. He's probably--as Jason says--the best player on the team at doing what he does.
As far as I'm concerned, now that he's worked so hard on his kickoffs, extending him was an absolute no-brainer, and we got it done with a reasonable contract. I know 8-8 means that everything has to be wrong with the team, all at once, in the minds of some, but the reality is that not everything we do right now is an obvious mistake. This is one of those things where people are definitely complaining about nothing at all in my book.