JBS
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 23,773
- Reaction score
- 25,902
fatboygixxer;4695350 said:should have been Holmes instead of Coale..we decided to keep a 6'5 body catcher over a talented reciever...
Can't argue either way...neither one did lick
fatboygixxer;4695350 said:should have been Holmes instead of Coale..we decided to keep a 6'5 body catcher over a talented reciever...
burmafrd;4695351 said:Looks more and more likely that they will pick up someone - doubt we go with 8 Oline.
jjktkk;4695347 said:Emp., in your opinion, did Beasley make Coale expendable?
burmafrd;4695351 said:Looks more and more likely that they will pick up someone - doubt we go with 8 Oline.
InmanRoshi;4695348 said:That's really the only cut that surprises me. Looks like we might start the season with only 8 OL.
One of them was injured though.GloryDaysRBack;4695352 said:Can't argue either way...neither one did lick
fatboygixxer;4695350 said:should have been Holmes instead of Coale..we decided to keep a 6'5 body catcher over a talented reciever...
Zordon;4695344 said:Unforgiveable that this buffoon Mcgee is being brought back over some of these other guys. How he survives year after after year is beyond me.
Wulfman;4695359 said:Before people start blowing up over the Cowboys keeping McGee or AoA or anyone else, remember that only HALF of the cuts have been revealed.
There's still hope...
Lodeus;4695360 said:One of them was injured though.
erod;4695339 said:True, but I think Beasley is going to get physically broken in half. He has the body of an eighth grader.
Idgit;4695317 said:He was a pet cat of mine, too, but he lost out to Beasley, head-to-head. There's little doubt about that.
fatboygixxer;4695350 said:should have been Holmes instead of Coale..we decided to keep a 6'5 body catcher over a talented reciever...
