Blitz him moreFrom a tactical perspective this just doesn’t make any sense. Straight Xs and Os - how do you suppose Quinn should do this?
He needs to shadow and harass KM incessantly.If the Dallas defense is able to corral Kyler Murray, Micah will surely play a big part in that. And that will essentially wrap up the DPOY award.
Is it safe to call TJ Watt a DE??
All Micah needs is one big game to wrap it up.
Imagine we drafted TJ over Taco
Watt has done nothing for Steelers defense except strap them with a salary crunch for years to come.
There’s pass rushers who do what Watt is doing every year. Parsons on the other hand, never seen before. If he wasn’t a rookie, this wouldn’t even be a debate. Diggs and Paraons should be the clear-cut front runners.
The League isn’t giving Micah the DROY and DPOY. He’s just getting DROY.
Same with Dak. He won’t get CPOY and WP Award. It will just be the CPOY.
These are just my thoughts after seeing how the League loves to spread awards around to make fans feel good instead of being objective.
We held the Giants to barely 300 yards, 6 points, took the ball away 4 times, allowed them to run one play in the red zone in the first 58 minutes, and you think Quinn deployed the defense incorrectly in that game. Okay.He needs Quinn to play him going forward from here on out. No more of that pure drop-back linebacker stuff like we saw against the Giants. It's a waste of the player and his abilities to limit him like that.
We held the Giants to barely 300 yards, 6 points, took the ball away 4 times, allowed them to run one play in the red zone in the first 58 minutes, and you think Quinn deployed the defense incorrectly in that game. Okay.
You said he “wasted” one of our best defensive players with how he deployed him in that game. Not sure how you could have been clearer.Show me where I said ‘Quinn deployed the defense incorrectly’ Strawman.
You said he “wasted” one of our best defensive players with how he deployed him in that game. Not sure how you could have been clearer.
So let me get this straight then. You’re saying:My comment was specific to Parsons. I hope that clears it up for you since you couldn’t read it the first time.
So let me get this straight then. You’re saying:
1. Quinn deployed Parsons incorrectly in that game, and that was a bad thing and he shouldn’t do it again.
2. Quinn deployed the defense correctly in that game.
I have no idea how you reconcile those two thoughts in your head, unless you think Parsons is completely irrelevant to the defense.
Sure does. You don’t have a response so you fall back on personal attacks, got it.It’s because I’m intelligent enough to separate the two things. I don’t have to deal in absolutes like a simpleton does. I can see details. I hope this finally clears things up for you.