USAToday - Inside Slant: Dallas Cowboys

2233boys

Benched
Messages
2,284
Reaction score
0
peplaw06;1515109 said:
We don't know what you are arguing is true, other than the fact that you told us that. Are you getting it?

Getting what, that my opinion is my opinion and not a fact???:confused:


Well yes I do, hell I even said so...
 

peplaw06

That Guy
Messages
13,699
Reaction score
413
2233boys;1515117 said:
Getting what, that my opinion is my opinion and not a fact???:confused:


Well yes I do, hell I even said so...

No getting the fact that you're tearing down the walls screaming about "we don't know the pats were gonna take him, we were told that, he was a reach, he would have been there later." Those are your positions. You are screaming that.

But someone else tells you that the Pats WERE gonna take him, and you discount it because we "don't know it, we were told it." Why give your opinion any more credence than these reports?
 

2233boys

Benched
Messages
2,284
Reaction score
0
big dog cowboy;1515124 said:
Claim it all you want. Look up the sites and check out the projections yourself if you don't believe me.
Give me an idea where and I will...
 

2233boys

Benched
Messages
2,284
Reaction score
0
Just found two. One with him going at 220 to the Saints and the other at 236 to the Eagles.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,571
Reaction score
27,856
Ive read where Stanback said his agent told him he would picked somehere around the fourth. ive seen him in peoples top 100s, ive heard the cowboys state that they heard from people saying that they were prepared to take him right after us in the 4th, ive seen projections before the injury he was going to a high first day pick. None of that really matters.

Jeff Ireland and our scouting department apparently felt that he was a 4th round pick and I have faith in him and his staff.
 

5mics

Next Year's Champions
Messages
1,827
Reaction score
0
DallasEast;1514706 said:
Well, generally agree with your assessment. You wouldn't happened to have noticed the name of the poster who might disagree with your assessment, which I inserted into my reply, eh?
:eek:: I totally didn't get that! I have this tendency to ignore people who don't make sense or argument the same thing over and over and over and over and over (even if their comments are right in front of me)...... :)
 

2233boys

Benched
Messages
2,284
Reaction score
0
DallasEast;1515144 said:
Scout.com had him rated as the 93rd overall rated player (categorized as a quarterback) on their board:

http://scout.scout.com/a.z?s=211&p=9&c=12&yr=2007&nid=83&lnid=124&rc=4&pid=88&pg=2

Which sites had him rated at 220 and 236, respectively?

http://www.thefootballexpert.com/buresmockdraft.html

As far as rating players, that Crosby was rated in the top 100 of a lot of people rankings including that one. Ratings don't mean much... I was told he was slated to be a 4th round pick. Haven't seen a mock yet with that.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,301
Reaction score
63,986
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
5mics;1515220 said:
:eek:: I totally didn't get that! I have this tendency to ignore people who don't make sense or argument the same thing over and over and over and over and over (even if their comments are right in front of me)...... :)
No prob. :wink2:
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,301
Reaction score
63,986
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
2233boys;1515501 said:
http://www.thefootballexpert.com/buresmockdraft.html

As far as rating players, that Crosby was rated in the top 100 of a lot of people rankings including that one. Ratings don't mean much... I was told he was slated to be a 4th round pick. Haven't seen a mock yet with that.
True enough. Still, how a player is rated is approximately where someone forecasting the draft expects the player to be drafted according to their overall value.
 
Top