Use TO to his strength's and I promise you this...

[alancdc]

I think if plays are called properly that gets him in motion with the ball in his hands, not on handoffs, but crossing routs like JR used to run he would again be a monster. When he gets it in space the results are obvious.

 

[WV Cowboy]

On some thing we do. As I said I have seen days where Irvin had nothing more than 2 catches for minimum yards same way with Moss there are going to be games where TO is not going to be a big factor and we have to rely on others

You talk about relying on others, ... when I look at our "others", I don't see how we ever lose.

We have so many weapons on offense, I think our problem is either the O-line or Romo. I'm leaning on the O-line.

If our O-line can protect Romo, and provide some running lanes for Barber, Jones & Choice, we should score 24-30 pts a game.

With the way our defense played at times towards the end of the year, that should be a formula for success.

 

[Doomsday101]

You talk about relying on others, ... when I look at our "others", I don't see how we ever lose.

We have so many weapons on offense, I think our problem is either the O-line or Romo. I'm leaning on the O-line.

If our O-line can protect Romo, and provide some running lanes for Barber, Jones & Choice, we should score 24-30 pts a game.

With the way our defense played at times towards the end of the year, that should be a formula for success.

Given the heat Tony was under for much of the year I tend to agree that the Oline did a poor job. That does not excuse Romo completely he is still responsible for taking care of the football but the Oline did not provide much help to him

 

[DallasEast]

I figured, since it was a win, it doesn't bolster your arguement

I figured that since you're not accounting for the entire season, which includes wins and losses, within your argument that you would utilize that tactic and remain standfast behind it. I was right.

 

[TheDude]

I know its the party line to say that but I disagree.



Also... when Owens is taken out of the game... Romo is not doing his job and getting the ball to the other playmakers.

It works both ways.

Agreed. The Green Bay was a prime example of Romo doing just that. TO was triple covered and Romo made them pay. we won tht game by 11 points and it wasn't that close.

That game Tony threw an INT (intended for Witten) and Owens was open on that play and ran down the guy

 

[DallasEast]

Yippie kai yay ....

:laugh2: He's had some success outside of the Die Hard films, but in them, he is definitely The Man.

 

[TheDude]

I figured that since you're not accounting for the entire season, which includes wins and losses, within your argument that you would utilize that tactic and remain standfast behind it. I was right.

I figure since you wont deal with facts on the field but esoteric "feelings", you. I laid out a synopsis of game and reasons for losses previously.

I guess you dont want to address that. Feel free to take pot shots about my "single mindedness".

 

[DallasEast]

I figure since you wont deal with facts on the field but esoteric "feelings", you. I laid out a synopsis of game and reasons for losses previously.

I guess you dont want to address that. Feel free to take pot shots about my "single mindedness".

Your on the field "facts" are no less correct or incorrect than.. say... 41gy#'s.

"Esoteric?" Nice.

I've addressed your posts. What are you expecting? Perhaps an admission stating that, "Terrell Owens isn't A problem?" I certainly hope not, but you tell me.

 

[TheDude]

Your on the field "facts" are no less correct or incorrect than.. say... 41gy#'s.

"Esoteric?" Nice.

I've addressed your posts. What are you expecting? Perhaps an admission stating that, "Terrell Owens isn't A problem?" I certainly hope not, but you tell me.

FACT = Tony ROMO throws INT to Pitt Safety while targeting Jason Witten in 4th quarter
FACT = Tony ROMO throws INT to Ed Reed twice and says "good as a punt"
FACT = Defense gives up 2 70+ yd runs to pedestrian RBs in crunch time
FACT = Tony ROMO throws INT to Chris Horton while targeting Jason Witten in 4th quarter

41gy#'s "FACT" : TO is in massive decline he has a 2.0YPA vs "red coreners" (excluding half of the games)

41gy#'s "FACT" :He Has declining YPA #'s for 3 of 4 years. (ommitting yr1 and yr3 were stratospheric and yr2 was still over 8.0). No one wants to account for the B Johnson experiment either.


Ok. If you think specious "WIP FACTS" are the same as "Romo throws INT at GB 14yd line", not much I can say to convince you. In fact the Owens lynch mpb has me convinced.......OWENS is the biggest problem on the team. If he had only said "This is perfect! Nothing should change! Our Execution is flawless!" we would have been 16-0 and SB bound. He is clearly too old and slow to do any good anymore and his complaints are causing Hamlin and Spencer to miss tackles, Proctor to "not quite reach his potential", Ware to have 20 instead of 23 sacks, Felix to get hurt, lobbied the coaches not to play Choice as soon as Felix went down, told them to not play Holland, made ROMO throw the INTs at Pitt and Balt and Wash, made Romo fumble 3 times vs. Arizona, Philly, got Barber, Flozell, R Williams, Kosier, Romo, McBriar hurt, etc. because HE made guys unsure about " what page" they were on while trying to block and cover an opponent across from them.


Enjoy the new Star Trek!

 

[LittleBoyBlue]

I know its the party line to say that but I disagree.

Also... when Owens is taken out of the game... Romo is not doing his job and getting the ball to the other playmakers.

It works both ways.

I agree and I think part of it is Romo trying to accommodate TO I think most spent too much time trying to make him happy. Romo needs to drop back and find the open man who ever that may be, not locking in on 1 player or being concerned that this WR or that one is unhappy. Romo job is to lead not accommodate to ease a players ego.

Wait a minute kimosabi.... how are you going to agree with me and the go back to that.

Doesnt make sense at all.

Agreed. The Green Bay was a prime example of Romo doing just that. TO was triple covered and Romo made them pay. we won tht game by 11 points and it wasn't that close.

That game Tony threw an INT (intended for Witten) and Owens was open on that play and ran down the guy

That is a problem for Owens. He is saying so. So would I if it happened too often. I think it has.

FACT = Tony ROMO throws INT to Chris Horton while targeting Jason Witten in 4th quarter

This works both ways too. I agree.

If people are going to go with the party line "We/Romo = targeting TO too much"

then the same can be said about Romo and Witten.

 

[Doomsday101]

Wait a minute kimosabi.... how are you going to agree with me and the go back to that.

Doesnt make sense at all.






That is a problem for Owens. He is saying so. So would I if it happened too often. I think it has.




This works both ways too. I agree.

If people are going to go with the party line "We/Romo = targeting TO too much"

then the same can be said about Romo and Witten.

I said agree it is part Romo, he is the leader he is the man who has the ball in his hand and should make the read and throw to the open man he should not be in a position to accommodate any one. Get open, run the right rout and hang on to the ball is what TO has to do Romo job is a bit more complex

 

[Cochese]

LOL. We aint winning a Super Bowl with this clown on the team.

The 81 defenders are out in FULL force right now.

 

[TheDude]

LOL. We aint winning a Super Bowl with this clown on the team.

The 81 defenders are out in FULL force right now.

Well, wont be any different than the 8 years before he was here then.

TO here or not, if Romo keeps throwing INT "punts", fumbling, and trying to be Tom Brady we wont win either.

If the Defense doesn't learn to tackle we wont win it either

If the R Guard doesn't get out of stance, we wont win it either

If the staff evaluation is "B Johnson is the best shot at winning", "Proctor is better than Holland", "Choice isnt ready", etc, we wont win it either

Unless, of course, all of those things happened from TO putting a spell on his voodoo dolls

 

[Cochese]

Well, wont be any different than the 8 years before he was here then.

TO here or not, if Romo keeps throwing INT "punts", fumbling, and trying to be Tom Brady we wont win either.

If the Defense doesn't learn to tackle we wont win it either

If the R Guard doesn't get out of stance, we wont win it either

If the staff evaluation is "B Johnson is the best shot at winning", "Proctor is better than Holland", "Choice isnt ready", etc, we wont win it either

Unless, of course, all of those things happened from TO putting a spell on his voodoo dolls

Superbad sucks. I never understood the influx of internet McLovins after that mediocre comedy.

 

[TheDude]

Which puts you on the wrong side of about every issue....



j/k

 

[alancdc]

Superbad sucks. I never understood the influx of internet McLovins after that mediocre comedy.

Here is where I draw the line sir. When that cop was dancing at the end of that movie....I laugh every time I see it.

 

[DallasEast]

In fact the Owens lynch mpb has me convinced.......OWENS is the biggest problem on the team.

As often as I read this and ones similar to it, it never gets old.

Enjoy the new Star Trek!

Live long and prosper, [strike]Terrell[/strike] McLovin.

 

[Bleu Star]

If people are going to go with the party line "We/Romo = targeting TO too much"

then the same can be said about Romo and Witten.

Forcing it to any player is ridiculous... Learn how to throw it away and live to fight another down...