NewJCowboy;1826299 said:
MY definition of a thug is quite clear. Mike Vick is not a thug in my eyes. You have your definition and I have mine.
And yours is apparently on the idiotic side...
"he's sadistic, and sociopathic, and generally a piece of garbage"
Talk about exaggeration.
Well, let's see-- a sadist is somebody who enjoys inflicting pain... while it's commonly meant to refer to people who enjoy hurting other people, behavioral psychiatrists have established that sadists often get their start as children by hurting small animals, generally pets... Vick's hobby was setting dogs to fight each other to the death... generally speaking, an animal that dies experiences pain...
So sadist seems to fit... next we have the word "sociopath"... that word is defined in some dictionaries as somebody who is completely unwilling or unable to behave in a way that is acceptable to society... a rich man who practices dogfighting as a hobby certainly fits that definition...
Now, we come to "piece of garbage"... well, we know that beyond the completely disgusting hobby of killing dogs, Vick also ran around having unprotected sex with women, without bothering to inform them he had herpes...
Yup, that's a piece of garbage in my book...
As for your definition of thug, most of the rest of the world defines that word as a brutal and violent criminal... well, the criminal part is no longer in dispute, he's sittin' in a jail cell for the next coupla years as a result of his criminal activity... so I guess you think that fighting dogs for fun and profit is neither violent nor brutal...
Many people in the country have committed far worse crimes and have gotten less time or even pardons.
Which means they got off light, not that Vick got screwed...
The guy committed a crime and he deserves jail time. I just think they gave him way too much.
Not even two years in jail is "way too much"??
Sounds like you would have been pissed if they gave him unsupervised probation...