Vick granted release from Kansas prison

davidb257;2655686 said:
Merriman cheats the players and fans with anabolic steriods, James Harrison beats the living daylights out of his girlfriend, half the giants are involved in a scandal where a loaded firearm was carried around a place with maybe a hundred innocent people, our own tank johnson has enough firepower to create a small militia.. and all these players are FINE by media standards.

Vick fights dogs, and he's the devil.
I just think that's funny.


AND WE HAVE A WINNER....K9 Life >>>> Human life. ITS MORONIC!
 
JVita17;2655834 said:
AND WE HAVE A WINNER....K9 Life >>>> Human life. ITS MORONIC!

wow...somebody else that doesnt have a freaking clue of any of the details
 
dbair1967;2655859 said:
wow...somebody else that doesnt have a freaking clue of any of the details

Sorry man Human life is just more valuable to me over dog life. I wouldnt have minded watching a few of Vicks dog fights tho...oh the good ole days..
 
fanfromvirginia;2655721 said:
Ummm... yeah, that's established legal fact. I don't know if they've got the goods on him personally doing it but it was happening at his operation, which he was in charge of.
A dog cannot "rape" another dog.
 
DallasCowpoke;2655576 said:
Actually, he's a parolee, and likely will be for sometime to come.

They, and only they, dictate his comings and goings and if they deem it not in his best interest to freely leave the county, much less the state, he's not going anywhere!

He's not a parolee. A Federal sentence can't be paroled. They worked around that by inventing Supervised Release Programs which is basically the same as probation.

fanfromvirginia;2655721 said:
Ummm... yeah, that's established legal fact. I don't know if they've got the goods on him personally doing it but it was happening at his operation, which he was in charge of.

It's not an established legal fact. It's a fact they 'bred' dogs. It's not a crime despite all the media bashing. If it were then many with horses would be guilty; same with cows yada. I never tied up a female but witches with a b in heat don't generally need anything once she's used to the sire.

JVita17;2655881 said:
Sorry man Human life is just more valuable to me over dog life. I wouldnt have minded watching a few of Vicks dog fights tho...oh the good ole days..

I doubt many here want you discussing your desire to see dogs fight.
 
JVita17;2655881 said:
Sorry man Human life is just more valuable to me over dog life. I wouldnt have minded watching a few of Vicks dog fights tho...oh the good ole days..


you make me sick.

Fitting to since you have pacman in your sig.
 
jdub2k4;2655954 said:
A dog cannot "rape" another dog.
The 'rape stands' exist (also called a 'breeding stand') and were in use at the Vick place.
The female dogs were bred to be so mean that they would bite any male that gets to close. So the rape stands are used to keep the female immobile while the male 'has his way'.

Nobody's equating this to rape, as that term is normally used because the females are no doubt in heat and...well... they're dogs. But it sounds pretty freaking cruel to me.

If you want to defend the use of rape stands, go ahead. It's a public forum -- you're free to present yourself to the world as in favor of any manner of inhumane treatment as you see fit.

See link for explanation.
http://www.slate.com/id/2170734/
 
jobberone;2655973 said:
He's not a parolee. A Federal sentence can't be paroled. They worked around that by inventing Supervised Release Programs which is basically the same as probation.



It's not an established legal fact. It's a fact they 'bred' dogs. It's not a crime despite all the media bashing. If it were then many with horses would be guilty; same with cows yada. I never tied up a female but witches with a b in heat don't generally need anything once she's used to the sire.



I doubt many here want you discussing your desire to see dogs fight.
I understand it's not rape. But it's cruel. See my explanation and link above for my response.
 
fanfromvirginia;2655988 said:
The 'rape stands' exist (also called a 'breeding stand') and were in use at the Vick place.
The female dogs were bred to be so mean that they would bite any male that gets to close. So the rape stands are used to keep the female immobile while the male 'has his way'.

Nobody's equating this to rape, as that term is normally used because the females are no doubt in heat and...well... they're dogs. But it sounds pretty freaking cruel to me.

If you want to defend the use of rape stands, go ahead. It's a public forum -- you're free to present yourself to the world as in favor of any manner of inhumane treatment as you see fit.

See link for explanation.
http://www.slate.com/id/2170734/

It's not cruel. Horses are at times held or immobilized. Cows can't move around much either when being serviced and it's not their choice. If your witch with a capital B bites then you muzzle her. It's generally not a problem.
 
fanfromvirginia;2655994 said:
I understand it's not rape. But it's cruel. See my explanation and link above for my response.


So which is it? Rape stands? or some other name?
 
jobberone;2656006 said:
It's not cruel. Horses are at times held or immobilized. Cows can't move around much either when being serviced and it's not their choice. If your witch with a capital B bites then you muzzle her. It's generally not a problem.
I disagree on this. They're being immobilized because the Bs will bite because the Bs have been bred to be as mean as possible because the Bs are going to be forced to dog fight to satisfy some men's inhumane appetite for cruelty.

The rape stands themselves are not cruel. The rape stands as a part of a dog fighting operation are.
 
fanfromvirginia;2655988 said:
The 'rape stands' exist (also called a 'breeding stand') and were in use at the Vick place.
The female dogs were bred to be so mean that they would bite any male that gets to close. So the rape stands are used to keep the female immobile while the male 'has his way'.

Nobody's equating this to rape, as that term is normally used because the females are no doubt in heat and...well... they're dogs. But it sounds pretty freaking cruel to me.

If you want to defend the use of rape stands, go ahead. It's a public forum -- you're free to present yourself to the world as in favor of any manner of inhumane treatment as you see fit.

See link for explanation.
http://www.slate.com/id/2170734/
I think you are reading way more into what I said than what was actually said.
I don't support rape not in the least bit. I've seen the permanent devastation it can cause and I have to deal with it daily because my wife was a victim of it, so please don't put that on me. My only point was that a dog cannot actually rape another dog. Nothing more.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,650
Messages
13,824,432
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top