Stautner
New Member
- Messages
- 10,691
- Reaction score
- 1
Bob Sacamano;1554934 said:here you go stautner
Appendix C - Section 15. Integrity of Game
Player recognizes the detriment to the League and professional football that would result from impairment of public confidence in the honest and orderly conduct of NFL games or the integrity and good character of NFL players....
....or is guilty of any other form of conduct reasonably judged by the League Commisioner to be detrimental to the league or professional football, the Commisioner will have the right, but only after giving Player the opportunity for a hearing at which he may be represented by counsel of his choice, to fine Player in a reasonable amount; to suspend player for a period certain or indefinitely; and/or terminate his contract
you see anywhere in here that the player has to be deemed guilty in a court of law in order to be suspended or cut? and this is in the old CBA, in the new one, you don't have to be convicted of a crime, you could plead no-contest and still be open for a suspension, I took liberty saying a criminal charge could get you suspended, since it's not expressely written, but don't you think a criminal charge is impairing the honesty and integrity of the game, which would be deemed detrimental?
and again, Tank Johnson wasn't convicted of any crime, yet was still cut, you can spin it all you want, but Goodell doesn't need to see a guilty verdict to be well within his rights to suspend a player, or a team be within their rights to cut one
Read the words in bold above ...........then think about it, then respond.
I asked you to show me where the mere charge or accusation is grounds for termination, and you provide me with something that says they have to be GUILTY.
And I never said a guy had to be guilty IN A COURT OF LAW, I only said that they could face legal action IN A COURT OF LAW if they aren't careful about taking action when guilt cannot be proven - your own quote above even shows they have to be guilty - and guilty in public opinion doesn't carry any legal weight.
TRY AND UNDERSTAND - PLEASE THINK:
1. There is a difference between saying that there can be legal ramifications for the decisions the NFL makes and saying the NFL has to work in conjunction with the court system.
2. I AM saying the NFL has to consider the legal ramifications of their decisions.
3. I AM NOT saying they have to tie themselves to what courts decide in a given case.