Concord
Mr. Buckeye
- Messages
- 12,825
- Reaction score
- 119
jackrussell;1597225 said:Wouldn't bother his supporters in the least.
He can do no wrong.
If he was guilty of Cockfighting it would.
jackrussell;1597225 said:Wouldn't bother his supporters in the least.
He can do no wrong.
burmafrd;1597232 said:I do so enjoy the silence coming from most of those that were defending Vick. Almost as much as those few that are still trying- its fun to watch them twisting in the wind.
Of course, my favorite was the poster who threatened me he'd eat my dog. How laughable is that? I'm setting the table now, anxiously awaiting his arrival. Think he'll show?
superpunk;1597307 said:I think my favorite is when a thread gets locked for some reason, and someone unlocks it so that they can have the last word. Classy stuff.
So you're equating internet forum conduct with torturing dogs.Bob Sacamano;1597332 said:it's probably just as classy as torturing defenseless animals
ConcordCowboy;1597336 said::laugh2:
I was thinking that too. If a threads closed it should be closed.
Posting a reply to have the last word...not good.
jackrussell;1597235 said:You know, this entire ordeal has been incredibly predictable.
First, it was the apologists ringing out that these are just allegations.
Next up...it was yes, he owned the house, but that didn't mean he knew anything about it.
Then it became the 'well you eat cows!' defense. Not to mention the baby raping, wife beating, deer hunting defenses.
All along it was a 'just dog fighting' thing, and has no effect on our society. I even recall one ardent apologist claim if you could show it affected society, he'd abandon his stance(must have missed it was a drug investigation that uncovered all this). While several direct links were made available to the FACT that there are outside ramifications as a direct result of dog fighting, they were ignored and the apologist continued his crusade.
Then it became the evil informants (partners) just trying to get a lighter sentence.
Finally, the most predictable thing of all. Once Vick admitted his guilt....it STILL isn't a bad thing, repeat above defenses. Yawn.
Of course, my favorite was the poster who threatened me he'd eat my dog. How laughable is that? I'm setting the table now, anxiously awaiting his arrival. Think he'll show?
superpunk;1597339 said:So you're equating internet forum conduct with torturing dogs.
Nice, summer.
You ain't kidding.
Bob Sacamano;1597348 said:not really, just getting in a shot on you and your fellow excuse makers
superpunk;1597353 said:I wasn't being serious.
What exactly am I making excuses for, exactly? I'd love to know. I'm almost sure your answer will be incorrect, because I have no idea what I could possibly be excusing.
But I'm sure you and your fellow pitchfork-wielding clansmen will set me straight on exactly what I think, or what I've said or done. (Ooh, it's fun to lump people in together without actually knowing what they believe.)
Bob Sacamano;1597360 said:you believe that dog-fighting shouldn't be punishable w/ jail-time because animals are being tortured legally as in hunting and slaughtering cows
Bob Sacamano;1597360 said:you believe that dog-fighting shouldn't be punishable w/ jail-time because animals are being tortured legally as in hunting and slaughtering cows
superpunk;1597364 said:No.
5 nos.
superpunk;1597339 said:You ain't kidding.
Bob Sacamano;1597384 said:oh well, I gave it a shot
Vick's still going to jail, thus making whatever your argument is, pointless
Bob Sacamano;1597384 said:oh well, I gave it a shot
Vick's still going to jail, thus making whatever your argument is, pointless