Video: Awesome play by Reeves!

[eduncan22]

This is what I'm talking about...

Speed + Technique = Awesome play by Reeves!

Bonus: We get to here "Gumball" gripe about the no call on PI.

Enjoy!

http://i89.***BLOCKED***/albums/k215/eduncan22/th_ReevesHUGEPlay.jpg

 

[Hoofbite]

And how was it not PI? Hes all over the guy before the ball is there.

Got a video of the play where Reeves gets his *** handed to him?

 

[utrunner07]

you do know it WAS pass interference right? No question about it...but sure you go and tout it as a great play since it fits your agenda...99% of the time that is a 40 yard penalty.

And what about the first play he was in on when he got completely turned around...

 

[burmafrd]

Its no longer even debateable. The Uneducated one is now worse then Kartr.

 

[Hostile]

Pass Interference is never a "great play." The refs gave us that one. Later they made up for it with a bogus "roughing the passer" penalty on Tank Johnson while the QB still had the ball in his hands.

 

[Scotman]

Nobody is a bigger homer than I am but even I had to admit that was a blatantly missed call.

 

[Boysboy]

Pass Interference is never a "great play." The refs gave us that one. Later they made up for it with a bogus "roughing the passer" penalty on Tank Johnson while the QB still had the ball in his hands.

Actually, it made up for that blown PI call on Owens that killed a drive in the 1st.

 

[Kilyin]

Pass Interference is never a "great play." The refs gave us that one. Later they made up for it with a bogus "roughing the passer" penalty on Tank Johnson while the QB still had the ball in his hands.

Tank speared the QB, and you can't do that. Collinsworth said it was a makeup call but I thought it was a good call. That was all on Tank.

Reeves was getting torched the whole game.

 

[Boysboy]

Tank speared the QB, and you can't do that. Collinsworth said it was a makeup call but I thought it was a good call. That was all on Tank.

In an earlier thread, theebs posted pictures which showed PROOF that Tank *clearly* didn't go helmet-helmet. It's on the 2nd or 3rd page somewhere.

 

[Kilyin]

In an earlier thread, theebs posted pictures which showed PROOF that Tank *clearly* didn't go helmet-helmet. It's on the 2nd or 3rd page somewhere.

I don't think it matters, you can't go helmet first at the QB in the pocket.

 

[Hostile]

Tank speared the QB, and you can't do that. Collinsworth said it was a makeup call but I thought it was a good call. That was all on Tank.

Reeves was getting torched the whole game.

Read the rule on "roughing the passer" which is what got called. The QB has to have let go of the ball.

 

[burmafrd]

Lambert was right. They ought to make the QBs wear skirts. He said that back in the late 70's. Imagine what he would say now?

 

[Boysboy]

I don't think it matters, you can't go helmet first at the QB in the pocket.

Again.........

http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=107547

 

[Kilyin]

Read the rule on "roughing the passer" which is what got called. The QB has to have let go of the ball.

Oh, you're right, if that's what they called.. wrong penalty but same result I think.

 

[Hostile]

Oh, you're right, if that's what they called.. wrong penalty but same result I think.

It's football and I don't see one thing wrong with Tank's sack.

No, I wouldn't if it was on Romo either.

 

[Scotman]

It's football and I don't see one thing wrong with Tank's sack.

No, I wouldn't if it was on Romo either.

Me either. That hit was surely hard, but not illegal. It ended up not making a difference except in Tank's stats. But I would have liked to have seen him credited with a great play.

 

[joseephuss]

I don't think it matters, you can't go helmet first at the QB in the pocket.

Is the face mask considered part of the helmet? I don't think it is. In those stills, it looks like Tank got him with his face mask. At full speed it looks different, so I can see why the ref threw a flag.

Same with the Reeves play. In real time it may have looked like he timed it right. It looked obvious to me it was a PI, but I am watching it from a couch. I am not the back judge or whomever who is trying to run backwards and see everything at once. It is understandable that they miss a call now and then and yes they did miss that one. It was a good play by Reeves because he got away with it. He should have interfered with Smith instead of letting him right by him untouched into the end zone.

And I am not convinced that Kartr was a much better poster. He turned to the conspiracy theory of why QC was not playing for anyone in the league. I have not seen that yet in defense of Reeves. Then again the same guy that says that Reeves is all world also supports drafting a CB high in the next draft. Why try to replace someone who is that good? A paradox.

 

[joseephuss]

Me either. That hit was surely hard, but not illegal. It ended up not making a difference except in Tank's stats. But I would have liked to have seen him credited with a great play.

Tank still gets credited for the sack.

 

[Tobal]

Is that change of direction right before the contact the reason they let that play go?

 

[Hostile]

I have not seen that yet in defense of Reeves. Then again the same guy that says that Reeves is all world also supports drafting a CB high in the next draft. Why try to replace someone who is that good? A paradox.

eduncan22 >>> :spanking: <<< joseephus