Well, I am not sure what I could do to convince you of this. It is funny you mentioned Metcalf because that is exactly who he reminds me of.Alexander;3294928 said:It is all nice to have versatility. Eventually at the end of the day, he has to be used however. We have had a hard enough time getting carries for our two backup tailbacks and receptions for second string tight end. Adding a jack-of-all-trades master of none type leads me to wonder what bang for the buck would be received.
If he were more experienced with special teams, I would feel much better about the prospects of adding him. Even Felix Jones was more experienced, yet struggled fielding punts when we tried. There is no assurance McCluster would be any better. Then you are stuck with a second/third round choice who might be limited in what they can contribute.
Gilyard and Ford could grow into being starting WRs eventually. What would McCluster's eventual niche be? He's not going to be a starting running back ever in this league. He might end up being a Metcalf/Gerald McNeil/Reggie Langhorne type.
I am not completely against the idea, I just need to be convinced he not only would be used appropriately, but that he could also contribute enough in a meaningful way to justify the second or third round choice he would likely cost.
If we had multiple second round choices (like say N.E.) this would be a mimimal risk high reward choice.Hostile;3294966 said:Is the 2nd round a risk? Of course it is.
There's evidence that McCluster could become a slot WR. He runs good routes, has good hands, and is smart. He doesn't have to be a RB.Alexander;3294928 said:It is all nice to have versatility. Eventually at the end of the day, he has to be used however. We have had a hard enough time getting carries for our two backup tailbacks and receptions for second string tight end. Adding a jack-of-all-trades master of none type leads me to wonder what bang for the buck would be received.
If he were more experienced with special teams, I would feel much better about the prospects of adding him. Even Felix Jones was more experienced, yet struggled fielding punts when we tried. There is no assurance McCluster would be any better. Then you are stuck with a second/third round choice who might be limited in what they can contribute.
Gilyard and Ford could grow into being starting WRs eventually. What would McCluster's eventual niche be? He's not going to be a starting running back ever in this league. He might end up being a Metcalf/Gerald McNeil/Reggie Langhorne type.
I am not completely against the idea, I just need to be convinced he not only would be used appropriately, but that he could also contribute enough in a meaningful way to justify the second or third round choice he would likely cost.
Chocolate Lab;3294989 said:There's evidence that McCluster could become a slot WR. He runs good routes, has good hands, and is smart. He doesn't have to be a RB.
What if he's like Wes Welker? That would be worth a second.
GloryDaysRBack;3294974 said:Golden Tate is the answer for a slot WR who can make big plays and work that gimmic offense.
Alexander;3294914 said:The only issue is that he is not all that experienced in special teams, despite all of these reports that he is a fit there. Mississippi just never used him that way very much. He had a grand total of eight punt returns and nineteen kick returns in four seasons at Ole Miss.
If special teams is the primary concern, then players like Gilyard are far more experienced.
Alexander;3294993 said:He cannot be like Wes Welker. That honor has now been passed from Amendola to Jordan Shipley.
CATCH17;3294998 said:But do you spend a 1st rounder on a slot receiver? Or even a 2nd on just a pure slot receiver?
I say no unless the guy in the 2nd is a heck of a return man.
I think Gilyard in the 2nd would be our best option because of overall upside and return potential.
I can't say i've seen enough of McCluster to say he can or can't be a slot receiver / return guy but I just dont have faith in this coaching staff to actually use him and if they do use him I have a feeling it will be obvious to the world he is about to get the rock.
Four;3294866 said:I don't know anything about college players, but if any of these guys isn't one hell of a returner as well as a quick slot guy I don't want him.
We need a great return guy who can also contribute to the offense.
I can't argue with that at all. I like the 2nd round of this draft a lot. I like it far better than the 1st round. Iupati or Thomas are really the only guys I like in round 1.Alexander;3294972 said:If we had multiple second round choices (like say N.E.) this would be a mimimal risk high reward choice.
I think he is more suited to be out wide.BraveHeartFan;3295061 said:Ok I get the ST thing that people would like to have some of these guys for. But as far as a speedy slot guy are we just not going to give Kevin any shot to get some extra work there? Why can't he be the speedy slot guy for this offense? The kid seemed pretty quick to me when he got a shot last year, seemed to have really good hands.
I'd hate to draft a guy, just because he's a potential return threat, where we'd have to use him in the slot and then, in return, not give KO any chance to up his touches on this team.