Just a guy, getting in some mental reps in his playbook, on a Saturday night.
Dumb question but is he not allowed to play until his appeal has been heard by the league? Due process and all....
Yes, the sentence has already been handed down, the appeal is just that, an appeal of the conviction. Does a person get to stay out of jail until an appeal of their conviction is heard? Nope. Here's what I've heard -- the reason he is in the NFL's drug program is because he has failed at least two tests, but it sounds like that happened in 2011. This suspension may very well be because he missed a couple of tests, rather than tested positive again. But in the league's eyes, a missed test is the same as a positive one. So, one missed test, four games. If he missed two, that's where the six games is coming from. But I think what the Broncos are arguing is that he was overseas on some USO tour, which caused him to miss one of those.
Von Millers better than DeMarcus Ware... NOT!
Career path similar to Merriman, I'd be willing to wager...
Career path similar to Merriman, I'd be willing to wager...
No, the difference is Merriman was only the player he was because he was 'roided out. Von Miller is the real deal, make no mistake about it. He is twice the player that Merriman ever hoped to be.
The suspension will be cut to ensure he doesn't miss the Dallas game
RKGs or not, I would be absolutely shocked if there was not one player on the Cowboys who didnt smoke weed every now and again. Just because they havent been caught doesnt mean it doesnt happen.
Our guys invented the "White House" remember?
I have no idea how whatt players did in the middle of the 90's has any impact whatsoever on what the players on this current team will do.
unless you're claiming that because players they play for the cowboys, they therefore will always have players participating in "white house" type events?
I think they got him for molly too. Not that it matters.Sheesh. How much weed did he smoke? 6 games for a recreational drug is pretty excessive.
The substance policy is the substance policy, so he deserves what he gets, but at some point you have to wonder how the equivalence works out when recreational drugs (if that's what it was, and as opposed to performing enhancing drugs that actually affect games) get this sort of response.
Add it to the ludicrous instance a few years back where Wade Wilson got smacked for a PED that was only taken to enhance the coach's personal performance off of a football field. I'd say this policy could use some attention at some point.
Any chance Peyton Manning violated the league's substance policy?
I think they got him for molly too. Not that it matters.