No!Would you let both go and try to sign Barkley for a reasonable amount?
Who knows if he will, If he walks and we tag Pollard we will still have a huge amount of money going to the RB position which to me is a bad spot to have huge money in todays NFL.Zeke can sign for 2.5 with incentives.
Gibbs, Charbonnet, Bigsby, and so on.It's not hard to upgrade the position when Zeke is the starter.
I'm willing to spend a little extra on a RB who can take a fly pattern to the house. Especially when we otherwise have nothing at RB for next year.
The new overpaid players are WRs. Pollard over Gallup every day.
I would tag a healthy Pollard (a true weapon) before someone like Schultz (a QB Woobie). Pollard is a home run threat everytime the ball is in his hand. You tag weapons, not RB's.Anyone who wants to franchise Pollard is crazy. Spending that much money when he is coming off an injury, usually gets hurt at some point in the season, and doesn’t have the body to be a feature back. It’s a typical lazy Jerry move - requires no thinking or work. Championship caliber teams don’t waste that much money on the running back position, but of course we will.
Drafting a RB is a great move. Not sure about that early. We are losing our starting guard, a starting CB with another coming off injury, and we need to add a WRmoney aside, I do feel that this is a position of need. I’m a Zeke guy but it is crystal clear he is at the tail end of his career. Then you throw in Pollards injury. I think by franchising Pollard and drafting a young buck in the first couple of rounds, we’ve already upgraded the position
I’m with you about Shultz but not Pollard. He’s not worth a 10 million franchise tag - especially coming off an injury. And his body is not likely to hold up anyways for long. Like I said, contenders do not waste millions on the running back position like we always do.I would tag a healthy Pollard (a true weapon) before someone like Schultz (a QB Woobie). Pollard is a home run threat everytime the ball is in his hand. You tag weapons, not RB's.
Zeke is easily replaceable. Tony Pollard (pre-injury) is NOT.
It doesn't really matter as long as they replace his production. They didn't do that when Amari was traded for a ham sandwich... and I don't really trust them to replace Pollard properly either and he DID produce when he was on the field. Pollard is more than a running back in my eyes, so that argument is moot with me. I do agree on the injury concern. If he is the same Pollard, then definitely worth the money.I’m with you about Shultz but not Pollard. He’s not worth a 10 million franchise tag - especially coming off an injury. And his body is not likely to hold up anyways for long. Like I said, contenders do not waste millions on the running back position like we always do.
Has there been an estimated timeline for his recovery? All I've seen is that he should be back in time for training camp.I would franchise Pollard and draft a quality back. Pollard is that much of a dynamic weapon you have to take the small risk. If his injury proves to be a prolonged issue then you’re only on the hook for one season.
What I don’t want to see is the team lean heavily on Malik Davis or Rico Dowdle.
Your up to 4 backs.Zeke takes a paycut, sign David Montgomery or Jamaal Williams and draft an RB. Pollard is going to go high. Let someone else pay that.
Read again. Let Pollard walk, DM or JW.Your up to 4 backs.
Not saying he was bad but there’s nothing Davis did that gave me pause to drafting someone. I would just play my cards right and draft someone in the 2nd, a future starter so you can get rid of pollard next year if he didnt pan outDavis actually played pretty well and showed promise. Bone headed OC didn't give Davis the chance to show similarly to not letting Pollard show the previous season. Stuck On Zeke is a bad infliction. I'm glad I got rid of mine. I still love Zeke but there is plenty enough evidence to see that Zeke doesn't have it any more. Heck, his running style is nothing like it was in his early days. It's well past time to move on.
Yeah, to be honest I'm not worried about how the Zeke situation plays out either way unless the paycut isn't significant.money aside, I do feel that this is a position of need. I’m a Zeke guy but it is crystal clear he is at the tail end of his career. Then you throw in Pollards injury. I think by franchising Pollard and drafting a young buck in the first couple of rounds, we’ve already upgraded the position
Dead money on Zeke is already sunk cost.Who knows if he will, If he walks and we tag Pollard we will still have a huge amount of money going to the RB position which to me is a bad spot to have huge money in todays NFL.
If Zeke is gone its like 11.8 dead money + Pollard tag of 10 mill....that dont smell good