The Cowboys starting DL minus Hardy has a grand total of 3 sacks in 7 games.
Ie they are averaging 0.42 sacks per game.
I'm sorry, that's not good enough for a team with Super Bowl aspirations.
How do you get to a 4? Just curious?
By gifting them the benefit of the doubt.
I am talking seasonwide, not just yesterday.
And I still don't know if 13 points made our defense good or if we played a very badly performing offensive team.
Besides Hardy, the rest are jags are average at rushing the passer. That nascar package is not going to be as good as we thought.
Crawford has 5 sacks for his career, most he has ever had in a season is 3.
Hayden is a joke with a career total of 2 sacks.
Gregory is unknown right now.
Lawrence has 1 sack this year
And last is Mincey who has a career total of 26 sacks in his 8 year career, with the most he ever had in a season is 8.
They went against a horrible Seattle line and managed 0 sacks.
This 0-5 thing we are in the middle of makes people cranky. Romo comes back, we start scoring more points, the DL gets more and better opportunities to get sacks, we get more sacks, Marinelli walks on water again.
Besides Hardy, the rest are jags are average at rushing the passer. That nascar package is not going to be as good as we thought.
Crawford has 5 sacks for his career, most he has ever had in a season is 3.
Hayden is a joke with a career total of 2 sacks.
Gregory is unknown right now.
Lawrence has 1 sack this year
And last is Mincey who has a career total of 26 sacks in his 8 year career, with the most he ever had in a season is 8.
They went against a horrible Seattle line and managed 0 sacks.
They have not been in a situation to really pin their ears back and go get the QB.
Your "Jerra" schtick is quite stale, but on to your ranting about the defense. What exactly did you want the Cowboys do this past off season. They signed Hardy, drafted Jones, Gregory, Wilson, and Russell. Exactly what were you expecting from this defense?I am surprised that someone is surprised that our D is held together by baling wire and glue and that many are journeymen or so inexperienced that they would contribute so little.
It was as if Jerra was in a daze, so confident that our offense could score so many points that a defense would be superf . . . superflou . . . would be a sidelight.
All summer I railed that we had a great offense but a below-average (if that) defense with a very very overrated secondary.
Now the cows have left home to roost and we are facing an early out of playoffs contention. And we are surprised our defense is a shambles while our offense was one QB away from being like the Raiders of old.
Now the big problem is that we need a RB and QB for our offense in the draft but the defense's needs are greater than even 3 future drafts to handle.
By gifting them the benefit of the doubt.
I am talking seasonwide, not just yesterday.
And I still don't know if 13 points made our defense good or if we played a very badly performing offensive team.
Also what good is a pass rush if the corners are playing off the receivers? Russell was able to get rid of the ball quick because the receivers weren't being challenged.
Your "Jerra" schtick is quite stale, but on to your ranting about the defense. What exactly did you want the Cowboys do this past off season. They signed Hardy, drafted Jones, Gregory, Wilson, and Russell. Exactly what were you expecting from this defense?
How many times was Carr way off his man, 2nd and 6 and Carr's playing him 10 yards deep. If you know Wilson is gonna get the ball out in 2-3 seconds why play so far off ? All frickin day !
And don't even get me started on how many tackles he wiffed on ! To me, he has now become a bigger liability than Claiborne.
I think you are very kind giving people the benefit of the doubt. You are good peoples.