Hostile
The Duke
- Messages
- 119,565
- Reaction score
- 4,544
See, and I thought we were discussing it. So I don't see how you can say it is some kind of scared topic that can't be discussed. As you pointed out it is 9 pages. if that isn't a discussion, then perhaps people think posting means free lottery tickets. Maybe you think a discussion means only agreeing with the idea posted? Well, not where I come from. A discussion can go anywhere once it is opened up. That's what I did, I opened up another avenue. If it is wrong for us to pass on him while having a RB we do depend on, how bad is it for a team that passed up on him but didn't have that RB they could depend on?That's the problem with this site though, everything seems too sacred to discuss. Whining about thread topics and trade discussion and thread merging, when in reality this is what most guys discuss amongst their friends.
It's not griping if I'm saying "wow I just realized we were one pick away from this guy and opted for Escobar instead".
That's me pointing something out and opening it up for discussion. 9 pages deep I see people are either very interested In The topic or overly critical of the discussion itself.
Either way my job here is done. I shared my opinion and got everyone thinking about it. Go Cowboys
I didn't whine about the topic. I introduced an alternative way of thinking about it. Namely that other teams really missed out on him while we as fans still wouldn't be happy with his selection if he was behind Murray, or we wouldn't be happy with Murray if he was behind him. Fans have a unique way of thinking that every Draft pick is going to be a Pro Bowl or a bust. I just don't see it that way. If Escobar ends up playing here for 8 years or so, then it was a good pick, because many players taken ahead of him won't have careers in the NFL that last 8 years, or so. Feel free to disagree. I won't think it is trolling my discussion, or that disagreeing with my alternative way of looking at it is too sacred to be introduced.