5Stars
Here comes the Sun...
- Messages
- 37,846
- Reaction score
- 16,869
Sarge;1920047 said:No, but my cousin Linda is...........
:laugh2: :laugh2: :laugh2:
So Linda and Rosie are, uh, "LesBeFriends"?
Sarge;1920047 said:No, but my cousin Linda is...........
MichaelWinicki;1920014 said:It was an easy route to the SB, but it was perhaps the most difficult route actually winning it.
I'd rather face a team I thought we had a better than 50/50 shot at beating-- and this New England team isn't it.
We would have gotten hammered.
Uh, that and a ton of talent.wxcpo;1920057 said:No team in the NFL had bigger distractions this year than the Pats and look where they are. First it was Moss and how he was going to tear apart the team, then along came spygate and that was huge and then Brady had his girlfriends and baby stories. What's the difference between the Cowboys and the Pats? Coaching and maturity that's what! Wade lost his team down the stretch and he couldn't get it back and the players are very young and as far as professional football players, they are no where near the maturity level of the Pats. It wasn't distractions that cost this team this year, it was simply a matter of coaching and youth.
wxcpo;1920057 said:No team in the NFL had bigger distractions this year than the Pats and look where they are. First it was Moss and how he was going to tear apart the team, then along came spygate and that was huge and then Brady had his girlfriends and baby stories. What's the difference between the Cowboys and the Pats? Coaching and maturity that's what! Wade lost his team down the stretch and he couldn't get it back and the players are very young and as far as professional football players, they are no where near the maturity level of the Pats. It wasn't distractions that cost this team this year, it was simply a matter of coaching and youth.
bbgun;1920055 said:1979 would have been easier. All we had to do was get by the Rams (who we defeated 30-6 earlier in the year) and then the Buccaneers at home.
Chocolate Lab;1920060 said:Uh, that and a ton of talent.
wxcpo;1920084 said:I think the Cowboys have better strengths over the Pats at RB, TE and LB positions.
HeavyHitta31;1919690 said:We should have slept-walked into the title game. I still can't believe we lost to Sheli and his incredibly average team...
Sarge;1920122 said:We do not have better RB's (as a group) than the Pats IMO/FWIW.
this is the kind of thinking that got the Cowboy in trouble this year. First of all...every NFC East opponent beat us (the Eagles and Skins destroyed us) the last time we met. The Giants arrow is pointing up because they can run, and Steve Smith is going to be a good weapon for them. Add a healthy Burress and Shockey and the Giants are the favorites to win the NFC next year. The Eagles add a Chad Johnson and they will be right back in the mix next year. The Commanders will play solid defense and run the ball...if they get above average production out of the QB position they will be in the mix. Here is what some people are not understanding about this team...they are soft. How many guys were running around talking about "I am glad we secured home field advantadge, because we don't want to go to Green Bay in January". First of all, the statement indicates Dallas assumed they would be winning their 1st round game...and secondly it shows that we were mentally defeated before a game if we are crying about having to play in the cold. All NY did was beat 3 straight division champs because they don't have a bunch of fake limelight seeking wannabes.joseephuss;1919704 said:A&M wins the NCAA title or Dallas wins a Superbowl? Which happens first?
I'm betting on Dallas and it could happen as soon as next season.
I don't know why it will be so much more difficult next year.
Favre will be a year older, not a year better. And that is if he is the QB. I still don't think much about Rodgers.
The Giants aren't going to be much different next year than this. Dallas beat them twice and had a decent shot of winning that playoff game this year.
The Commanders. Pass.
The Eagles. They have to re-tool.
Tampa. Needs a reliable, younger QB.
Seattle. Their offense is going to go through some tweaks.
The NFC is not going to be too different. And if Dallas gets to the SB, the challenge may not be as great. The Patriots are going to older especially on defense. The Colts? Who knows how good they will be if they have to deal with a new coach.
firehawk350;1920786 said:God forbid you actually lose a player to injury! Dallas was exceptionally fortunate this year in injury terms, even with those nagging injuries to Newman and Henry. Think about if Ware went down for the season, or if Henry went down. Some of it's having younger players but there's also considerable luck in that.
Having said that though, nothing is guaranteed in the NFL. I'm sure the Bears thought 07 was their year. A lot of people picked San Fran to really push for the NFC West (young defense getting another year, Alex Smith and Frank Gore both getting another year). How about the Saints? The amount of young talent on that team is scary, but it just didn't go their way.
So stop thinking that you're the best team in the NFC, because you're not. Your 13-3 record buys you nothing at this point. Nor is it indicative of your ability to dominate in the future. You had a great 07, but there's a lot of ebb and flow to the NFL, and until you sustain success for a couple of years (like the Chargers, Colts and Pats), you can't assume you'll be back on top.
firehawk350;1920786 said:God forbid you actually lose a player to injury! Dallas was exceptionally fortunate this year in injury terms, even with those nagging injuries to Newman and Henry. Think about if Ware went down for the season, or if Henry went down. Some of it's having younger players but there's also considerable luck in that.
Having said that though, nothing is guaranteed in the NFL. I'm sure the Bears thought 07 was their year. A lot of people picked San Fran to really push for the NFC West (young defense getting another year, Alex Smith and Frank Gore both getting another year). How about the Saints? The amount of young talent on that team is scary, but it just didn't go their way.
So stop thinking that you're the best team in the NFC, because you're not. Your 13-3 record buys you nothing at this point. Nor is it indicative of your ability to dominate in the future. You had a great 07, but there's a lot of ebb and flow to the NFL, and until you sustain success for a couple of years (like the Chargers, Colts and Pats), you can't assume you'll be back on top.
joseephuss;1920001 said:... Will Jason Garrett be much different when he ascends the thrown?
5Stars;1920065 said:I agree...remember, this is a fairly young team that now has a nucleus or "core" players in their really first year of success!
I think all that winning went to their heads (coach Wade too) and they thought they could just do what they wanted to do. Well, it does not work that way. You have to finish the job...you don't take time off inbetween building a million dollar house for someone...you get the job done, then go play.
Or as my dad used to tell me, "You do one thing right, then move on to the next"...
I think they learned this, and next year everyone will be better off for it.