TwentyOne
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,667
- Reaction score
- 5,313
stasheroo;2138830 said:It worries me!
When Owens went down, the offense went with him. If he's lost for any period of time, the results will be similar. Others receivers had the chance to 'step up' and none did. Owens is the 'big dog' and everyone else is a role player.
Crayton did not start at the #2 spot by design last year, and he shouldn't this year either. He should be where he's supposed to be - at the #3 position.
Nothing can derail this team's Super Bowl hopes quicker than an injury to Owens, because the passing game will go with him.
That's the point.
It was never the question that our offense lacks power with the wr setup we had and have. the problem was depth behind to. i don't feel good baout our offense when i look at last years games with an injured or a missing TO. when i think about garrett and his tendency to abandon the run when the offense stutters it worries me eve n more.
but you can't fix every problem in one offseason. an compared to others teams our problems are really small. ok we have a high aim - tahts winning the SB. to archive this goal we have to stay healthy at the WRs starting positions. otherwise bye bye lombardy