Naw you thinking too deep into it. Dak will win us a SB. If the resident idiots don’t think so that’s in them. It’s hilarious they thought he was gonna get cut or traded lol.So it's hilarious for fans to realize Dak is going nowhere thereby that translates into the Cowboys going nowhere? I am glad you see a continued Super Bowl drought as hilarious so long as the Dak fan boys get their way.....as MC says: "Dak over Dallas" is your mantra.
Yeah god forbid we pay for a guy who had one of the best playoff performances of all time and has contributed to winning 25 games in two years. The horror!!!!Prescott is in the 11-16 range with the likes of Cousins, Carr and Jones. I.e., in the whatever you do, do not pay the man bracket otherwise you will be kneecapped until he has gone
It's not just one side to blame, it's both sides. When a player holds out in Cabo for an outrageous amount of money, that gives the owners a choice, pay up and hurt his team with the resulting cap issues or let the player walk, so another team signs the talent and the original team goes without.That is true, but nobody forced the Cowboys to sign Dak or Zeke to new contracts, they could have let both of them walk in free agency if the team wanted to.
Dont blame the players because Jerry and the Cowboys caved, its not Dak or Zeke's job to distribute the pie, that is the job of the GM.
Against an 8-9 team that shouldn't have even been in the playoffs. How did Dak do against real competition the following week?Yeah god forbid we pay for a guy who had one of the best playoff performances of all time and has contributed to winning 25 games in two years. The horror!!!!
If he can, he will. He's already proved that.How about if he wants 50m a year?
Dak held this front office's feet to the fire last contract to extract every dime from Jerry that he could get.
Who's to say he wont do it again?
And Dak knows that.If push comes to shove the Cowboys will cave, making a decision that's better for Dak than it is from the team. They've done it before and they like their guys.
Yikes!!!If he can, he will. He's already proved that.
It was a lot of teams that didn’t belong in the playoffs. They would’ve been 9-8 had they not rest their starters.Against an 8-9 team that shouldn't have even been in the playoffs. How did Dak do against real competition the following week?
I blame Jerry and Stephen for waiting so long to get Dak's contract done. If they would have been more proactive in the beginning, they would have leverage in getting his contract done. Jerry & Stephen clown show is why we pay so much for our own players and not want to trade them or take in any FA. This causes our players to ask the highest amount given because they know that our FO won't trade them or sign FAs. I'm blaming our FO for such ineptness.How about if he wants 50m a year?
Dak held this front office's feet to the fire last contract to extract every dime from Jerry that he could get.
Who's to say he wont do it again?
First off pointing to 1 game against a one-dimensional 8-9 TB team that barely made the playoffs while overlooking Dak's career and league-high INT's in spite of missing 5 games speaks volumes.Yeah god forbid we pay for a guy who had one of the best playoff performances of all time and has contributed to winning 25 games in two years. The horror!!!!
I said he contributed to winning 25 games I never said he won the 25 games. And y’all keep trying to discredit Dak but how come nobody else has had a great performances against the 8-9 teams that have entered in the playoffs? Or the bad teams who shouldn’t have been in the playoffs? They had Brady and went toe to toe with him. Put some respect on his name.First off pointing to 1 game against a one-dimensional 8-9 TB team that barely made the playoffs while overlooking Dak's career and league-high INT's in spite of missing 5 games speaks volumes.
Secondly, you claiming Dak has contributed to winning 25 games the past 2 years (which of course you factor in the regular and post-season) is inaccurate given Dak has missed 6 games the past 2 years therefore the actual QB record breaks down as follows for the last 2 years: Dak 20-11(.645 win %) Rush 5-1 (.833 win %).
Lastly, you left out the last 3 years wherein Dak's record has been 22-13 (regular season and post-season) while missing 17 games.
So, you aren't paying a guy $40M AAV with a 2023 cap hit of $49.13M (currently ranking 2nd for all 2023 QB's) for 1 playoff game against a sub-par team but rather a QB that has compiled a 22-13 record (.629 win %) the last 3 years but also one that has missed 17 out of a possible 53 games (32.1% of games missed) and that led the league in INT's for 2022 in spite of missing 5 games.
How does a player contribute to wins when they don't play in 6 of them? That is the point I was making. As for why other teams haven't had a great performance against a sub .500 playoff team, given there have been only a handful of instances it's a rather small sample size.I said he contributed to winning 25 games I never said he won the 25 games. And y’all keep trying to discredit Dak but how come nobody else has had a great performances against the 8-9 teams that have entered in the playoffs? Or the bad teams who shouldn’t have been in the playoffs? They had Brady and went toe to toe with him. Put some respect on his name.
I don’t remember any Dak haters being confident we would beat the Buccs on the road.
Jerry means well, but the job of GM is over his head.I blame Jerry and Stephen for waiting so long to get Dak's contract done. If they would have been more proactive in the beginning, they would have leverage in getting his contract done. Jerry & Stephen clown show is why we pay so much for our own players and not want to trade them or take in any FA. This causes our players to ask the highest amount given because they know that our FO won't trade them or sign FAs. I'm blaming our FO for such ineptness.
Forced to do it?I think people understand pretty well how a restructure functions.
What they criticize is that you gave him a contract where you are essentially forced to do it.
This is not about the player, its right now about the results of the resturcture for the franchise we have to deal with.
Excuses…..Commanders just made it a few years ago….How does a player contribute to wins when they don't play in 6 of them? That is the point I was making. As for why other teams haven't had a great performance against a sub .500 playoff team, given there have been only a handful of instances it's a rather small sample size.
They should have Dak play out the year anyway.Then they don't do it and play the yr out, and subtract 24 mil from 50 and that's Dallas new cap space. It's not really hard to put peices together.