CFZ What do we do now at QB?

[Tabascocat]

They are not getting rid of Dak after this year without a $61M hit, Jed may not be a good football man but he knows money and he knows that much cap hit would cripple this team for years to come.

It will cripple them for one year and the dead cap hit is 28 million. That is much better and cheaper than an extension.

 

[TwistedL0g1k]

Jerry doesn't like to admit mistakes, and Dallas has a lot of money committed to Dak- but make no mistake: Jones is well aware of what's going on at the QB position, regardless of the propaganda drivel that spews from his mouth. He knows what's happening. He reads/hears the media. If the QB keeps going south, Dallas will make a change at some point in time. I doubt it will be the correct change, as JJ is reluctant to spend the draft capital needed. Don't expect any big changes this season though. Dallas is rolling with Dak for better or worse.

 

[Reverend Conehead]

DITTO got it..its that easy

no it actually does point to that because Prescott doesn't need to be benched he would not be benched they do have power oh Cooper rust and Trey Lance are not the answer therefore Prescotts not gonna be bench. It's not dribble when I'm explaining why he doesn't need to be benched because you have the bench the whole damn team got it is that short enough for you that there's no run game the offensive line is poor did rob receivers weren't getting open and the defense played terrible in both the losses who exactly you gonna bench 44 players because that's what it would be and the coach would have to fire himself because that's how bad it was on all sides of the ball...

See how thick you are you have no comprehension when someone tries to help you out there's a reason players are not being bent because it was a whole damn team that played bad period end of story you expect the quarterback to be benched when there was a reason he couldn't get it done?? Again we're back to you being a troll and a hater we get it you only see one thing you're myopic you think it's the quarterback and we can all see both losses we're a team loss!!

Act like an adult. You STILL haven't responded to what I wrote. It wasn't about the suitability of other quarterbacks. It was about Jones interfering with his coach's authority by designating a player as unbenchable. The point was it's supposed to be the coach's decision, not the owners. That's the 4th time I've had to explain it. You don't get it because you're stuck in your own absurd misinterpretation of what I originally wrote.

Then you bring out insults because you don't bother to have a real dialogue. You're acting like a 4th grader. Sorry I compared you to a Russian novelist. You would be hopelessly lost in any kind of document that complex.

See here's how dialogue works, and I'll try to keep it really simple.
1. Person A writes something, for example, "I need to decide whether to get my son a bike for his birthday or whether to make him get a job and pay for one."
2. Person B writes something that actually corresponds to what the person wrote, for example, "He's just a kid; buy him the bike" or "It's better for this character to make him earn the money for it" or even "Make him earn half the money, and you pay the other half." The point is, the response should have something to do with what the person wrote instead of being tantrum-throwing trollish drivel.

Here's how you did it:

Person A: "I need to decide whether to get a bike for my son for his birth day or if I should have him earn money to buy one."
Blueblood70: "What? You disgusting troll. I'm sorry you love cowmyanism to be able to think such thoughts. You're a terrible father."

See the difference? Of course you don't. I don't know why I bothered. Now watch him respond with something that has nothing to do with anything.

 

[KingCorcoran]

Act like an adult. You STILL haven't responded to what I wrote. It wasn't about the suitability of other quarterbacks. It was about Jones interfering with his coach's authority by designating a player as unbenchable. The point was it's supposed to be the coach's decision, not the owners. That's the 4th time I've had to explain it. You don't get it because you're stuck in your own absurd misinterpretation of what I originally wrote.

Then you bring out insults because you don't bother to have a real dialogue. You're acting like a 4th grader. Sorry I compared you to a Russian novelist. You would be hopelessly lost in any kind of document that complex.

See here's how dialogue works, and I'll try to keep it really simple.
1. Person A writes something, for example, "I need to decide whether to get my son a bike for his birthday or whether to make him get a job and pay for one."
2. Person B writes something that actually corresponds to what the person wrote, for example, "He's just a kid; buy him the bike" or "It's better for this character to make him earn the money for it" or even "Make him earn half the money, and you pay the other half." The point is, the response should have something to do with what the person wrote instead of being tantrum-throwing trollish drivel.

Here's how you did it:

Person A: "I need to decide whether to get a bike for my son for his birth day or if I should have him earn money to buy one."
Blueblood70: "What? You disgusting troll. I'm sorry you love cowmyanism to be able to think such thoughts. You're a terrible father."

See the difference? Of course you don't. I don't know why I bothered. Now watch him respond with something that has nothing to do with anything.

Nicely done.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Dak is not the problem.

he is part of the problem.

 

[RoboQB]

Got to find Doc and Marty unfortunately.

"1.21 jiggawatts!"

 

[America's Cowboy]

he is part of the problem.

He's not the problem. Get over it already.

 

[McMicah]

Inform Dak he is done as starter after the season and see if he will waive the no trade clause. Would you trade Dak for Russel Wilson?

(I wouldn't but Sean Payton would)

If the FO has the desire to squeeze value from Dak, this is actually the best option. Yes, that’s an insanely expensive backup, but making the real ease of Dak ‘not imminent’ will put interested teams in a bind, driving up trade capital demand. Dak would also want a trade and want to control what team he goes to

 

[TwistedL0g1k]

Might have to pay another team ($ and/or picks) to accept Dak's ludicrous contract, but a trade might be the best way out.

 

[rnr_honeybadger]

Package Micah, Lamb and Diggs for the number 2 pick to draft Drake Maye, aka Justin Herbert part 2.

He’ll sell more jerseys his first year than Dak’s whole career here.

The best part will be that you won't have to dumb the offense down anymore.

 

[rnr_honeybadger]

Might have to pay another team ($ and/or picks) to accept Dak's ludicrous contract, but a trade might be the best way out.

Jerry is the only GM in the league to pay 40 mil a year for a backup QB.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

He's not the problem. Get over it already.

if you don't think he is part of the problem, then you are not seeing the problem.

 

[jgboys1]

Nothing, apparently! Jerry is saying that Dak gives us the best chance to win a Super Bowl. He’s the expert and why would he lie?

 

[tromofan]

We're about 40 million a year late with this question.

 

[blueblood70]

Act like an adult. You STILL haven't responded to what I wrote. It wasn't about the suitability of other quarterbacks. It was about Jones interfering with his coach's authority by designating a player as unbenchable. The point was it's supposed to be the coach's decision, not the owners. That's the 4th time I've had to explain it. You don't get it because you're stuck in your own absurd misinterpretation of what I originally wrote.

Then you bring out insults because you don't bother to have a real dialogue. You're acting like a 4th grader. Sorry I compared you to a Russian novelist. You would be hopelessly lost in any kind of document that complex.

See here's how dialogue works, and I'll try to keep it really simple.
1. Person A writes something, for example, "I need to decide whether to get my son a bike for his birthday or whether to make him get a job and pay for one."
2. Person B writes something that actually corresponds to what the person wrote, for example, "He's just a kid; buy him the bike" or "It's better for this character to make him earn the money for it" or even "Make him earn half the money, and you pay the other half." The point is, the response should have something to do with what the person wrote instead of being tantrum-throwing trollish drivel.

Here's how you did it:

Person A: "I need to decide whether to get a bike for my son for his birth day or if I should have him earn money to buy one."
Blueblood70: "What? You disgusting troll. I'm sorry you love cowmyanism to be able to think such thoughts. You're a terrible father."

See the difference? Of course you don't. I don't know why I bothered. Now watch him respond with something that has nothing to do with anything.

actually, i did you do not want to see it..

 

[Captain-Crash]

we do nothing. you guys thought it was Moore, now fat Mike, the offensive line, the defense, and anybody else but the one guy who sucks. Leave him in, Jerry and he needs to hear the boos......

 

[Creeper]

If anyone watched the USC - Notre Dame game last night you know now that drafting a college QB comes with some risk. Caleb Williams looks great, right? Then he rolls out a stinker like last night and you can see that his transition to the NFL game may not be so smooth. College is not the NFL. So before you dump Dak for a draft pick you need to consider Ryan Leaf, and all the other 1st round QBs who have not been successful. Dak is not perfect, he is above average and at times below average. But you want Zack Wilson? Or Carson Wentz? or any of the other high picks who are worse than Dak? It could happen. In fact, any QB picked in the 1st round out of college is more likely to be a bust than a success based on history.

I am not recommending the Cowboys do nothing. They have to come up with a Plan B because Dak's contract is up after next year. That means Dak will be looking for a new contract and one that pays more than what he gets now. Jerry has a decision to make because Dak's CAP value is almost $60 million next year.

The Cowboys should have taken steps to address this 3 years ago, but they chose not to. At this point they need to find out if Trey Lance can do the job. Can he manage the game? My guess is the answer is no because he couldn't beat out Purdy or Darnold with SF, and SF appears to be a pretty good judge of talent. Still, I would give Lance some chances to play in games that are already decided, like the game against SF. If I had to begin negotiations with Dak on a new contract I would be looking for leverage and without a backup QB plan, Jerry has none. He gave that away with Dak's last contract.

 

[kskboys]

Don't need a top 10 pick to find a QB in the draft. In fact, it may be a curse to draft a QB so high...
History of NFL is littered with HOF QBs who were drafted late in the first or even after the first round.

Know what else is littered w/ 1st round QBs? Top 10 lists.

 

[Captain-Crash]

we know what we have in dak, it's called crap. What's the difference in getting crap to replace crap who wins nothing?

 

[kskboys]

Package Micah, Lamb and Diggs for the number 2 pick to draft Drake Maye, aka Justin Herbert part 2.

He’ll sell more jerseys his first year than Dak’s whole career here.

Caleb just vaulted Drake into the #1 slot.