After 14 games, what do you guys think of him? I must say i wasn't happy with that pick during the draft, but I've changed my mind, Zack Martin has had a tremendous year as a rookie but one can argue Hitchens has been equally as important.
We just may have picked the 4th best LB of that draft class. You have LBs Mack, Barr and Mosley picked in the 1st round who are much better. What do you have with Pgh LB Shazier? He pretty much disappeared after a strong pre-season (I think). Haven't heard much from Shazier lately. And then the Eagles took LB Marcus Smith in the 1st. Well, so far, Hitchens is better than the Eagles 1st rd LB Smith in my eyes.
shhhhh, Jerry is responsible for only the bad picks. you must not have gotten the memo. lol
After 14 games, what do you guys think of him? I must say i wasn't happy with that pick during the draft, but I've changed my mind, Zack Martin has had a tremendous year as a rookie but one can argue Hitchens has been equally as important.
Good ole designated Dex. I am not looking forward to Hitch for Suh trade threads.Hitchens has insanely good instincts for a rookie. I see a really good player for many years to come.
He reminds me of Dexter Coakley.
Risen is probably still holding onto his idea that Hitchens and Fred could have been drafted several rounds later.
I envision Fred someday at his Hall of Fame induction with Risen in the audience screaming "it does not matter what he did in the NFL, the Cowboys wasted a 1st on him when they could have had him in the 4th".
BTW, Hitchens is a scrub.
Did not know anything bout the player when he was picked, so did not get all the vitriol that was thrown at the pick. When I went and looked at his college film he looked like a player. Happy with his year and think he has exceeded expectations. Solid, effort player. Not going to be a star, but looks like he will develop into a solid LB'er for us. It looks like his football intelligence has helped out this year =, as he was thrust into playing early.
There's no question Hitchens has exceeded expectations from most of us. Nevertheless, he has development that is sorely due in the area of coverage that could really put him over the hump. For a rookie, he's done well and has proven to be a quick study. That's about all that could fairly be expected at this point in his career.
After 14 games, what do you guys think of him? I must say i wasn't happy with that pick during the draft, but I've changed my mind, Zack Martin has had a tremendous year as a rookie but one can argue Hitchens has been equally as important.
I see you've taken the Idgit approach of entirely making things up.
Someone kindly tell our resident Youtube scout that I supported the Frederick pick. That I was talking about Frederick months before the draft.
BTW, Hitchens is a scrub. Much like Jermey Parnell. You need to burn that spreadsheet.
RS, I just don't get your hard stance on this one. I get your value argument, but there is ALWAYS a chance that at least one other team (and that's all it takes) sees the same things you see in a player.
In Hitchens I see a guy who is at least adequate at 4 different positions as a rookie. He's a decent special teams player, and probably most importantly, he's giving meaningful snaps now. If he never improves AT ALL, it was a good 4th round pick.
He's a significant upgrade over Orie Lemon, Cam Lawrence, Caleb McSturdy, Ernie Sims, and roughly on par with Bruce Carter. He may not be a superstar, but he's not a gaping black hole on the field either.
With this team's recent 4th round history, I probably would have been happy with a reliable FG holder.