Alexander
What's it going to be then, eh?
- Messages
- 62,482
- Reaction score
- 67,294
He will still be winning if he doesn't have Brady. Has done it before. I just don't think he will keep going without him.not nothing, but much less
He will still be winning if he doesn't have Brady. Has done it before. I just don't think he will keep going without him.not nothing, but much less
He will still be winning if he doesn't have Brady. Has done it before. I just don't think he will keep going without him.
He will still be winning if he doesn't have Brady. Has done it before. I just don't think he will keep going without him.
He may be referring to when Cassel had a little success when Brady was out and then this year.He's done it before?
When? What year?
That is exactly what I am referring to.He may be referring to when Cassel had a little success when Brady was out and then this year.
The pats pay 2 guys. Gronk and Brady everyone else is expendable to them.
The pats pay 2 guys. Gronk and Brady everyone else is expendable to them.
He may be referring to when Cassel had a little success when Brady was out and then this year.
Sickening. They have more draft picks than we do too. Even after forfeiting one for deflategate.
That is exactly what I am referring to.
that is what happens when you have stability at QB with a dominant QB that even gives the team team-friendly contracts.
You mean having a cap hit for a QB that isn't even going to play for you that is the largest in the league isn't effective strategy?
We can do whatever we want in free agency.You mean having a cap hit for a QB that isn't even going to play for you that is the largest in the league isn't effective strategy?