Zordon
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,292
- Reaction score
- 46,650
a healthy franchise QB
that makes us a playoff team not a super bowl team.
healthy romo + real secondary = super bowl team
a healthy franchise QB
Biggest difference between the Broncos and the Cowboys?
The Bronco's GM had the courage to realize his coach (John Fox) who had gone 12-4, 13-3, and 13-3 over the past 3 years wasn't going to be able to push the team over the top and got rid of him.
Gonads of steel IMHO.
I can't imagine a universe where Jerry Jones would ever makes a move like that.
You're also not going to win CRAP when the offense is 30th in the league in offensive scoring with Tony out.
This is the only correct answer in the thread. Everything else is just symptoms.
Unlike the two organizations in the Super Bowl, this organization is not serious about winning championships. Its simply a hobby for one family that refuses to make the hard decisions that might make it successful (like getting a real GM and Director of Player Personnel).
Despite the lack of offensive production the Cowboys still had the lead in several games that the defense coughed up in the second half/4th quarter. We had 2 OT games vs New Orleans and Philly where our offense never saw the field due to the defense giving up a first possession TD. The Cowboys were LAST in the league in turnover differential with a -22 in 2015.
Not being able to force turnovers and with the lack of a pass rush the only way to win with this defense is to keep them off the field and that will catch up with even a great offensive team at some point.
One of the reasons the Cowboys had success in 2014 they were 9th in turnover differential with a +6 which gave our offense more opportunities with the ball and limited our defensive snaps. You're not going to win CRAP with a defense that can't force turnovers, make critical stops or mount a steady pass rush.
I agree . I think the problem is the defensive scheme and DC. Rod is a well respected coach, but I don't see the results with the defense that I expected.
that makes us a playoff team not a super bowl team.
healthy romo + real secondary = super bowl team
The Broncos showed 2 years ago in the Super Bowl that regardless how great an offense you have if you don't have a solid defense that can get after the QB and create turnovers you can get pummeled.
There have been several Super Bowl champions lately that "showed" that you don't need a dominant defense, either. The Colts, Saints and Giants won with below-average defenses, the Ravens' defense was average, and the Patriots' was just a little above average last year.
It is possible to win the Super Bowl without a dominant defense -- just as it is without a dominant offense. You just need to play better than your opponent, particularly when it comes to passing offense and/or passing defense.
Biggest difference between the Broncos and the Cowboys?
The Bronco's GM had the courage to realize his coach (John Fox) who had gone 12-4, 13-3, and 13-3 over the past 3 years wasn't going to be able to push the team over the top and got rid of him.
Gonads of steel IMHO.
I can't imagine a universe where Jerry Jones would ever makes a move like that.
A lot of teams have won SB's without having a great defense not saying "every" team needs a great defense to win a championship but it comes down to the QB and offense you're facing in the SB. ... When you're facing a high potent offense that's being led by an elite QB you need a pass rush. Very difficult to defense an elite QB without a pass rush or an inability to force turnovers.
Manning had a pretty lousy game yesterday with only 141 yards passing with an int, lost a fumble and no TD's. He finished with a 56.6 passer rating and Denver won going away due to a great defensive performance. His performance along with Broncos offense that only produced 34 yards rushing was the worst I've seen in a SB from a winning team. If yesterdays game didn't prove that defense wins championships nothing will.
Had Denver had the defense they had 2 years ago vs Seattle in the SB the Panthers would have blown them out. It was all the pressure including the 7 sacks on Cam and a defensive TD that won Denver that game. After watching what Denver did yesterday you're going to see a lot of teams drafting for defense come April.
Manning sucked all right. But Cam Newton had an even worse QBR (55 vs. 56). And Peyton actually had more passing yards than Elway did in SB 32 (141 vs. 120). And I think Rothlesberger's first SB win was the worst I have ever seen a SB QB play and Dilfer's SB win with the Ravens was easily just as underwhelming as Peyton Manning's SB 50 performance. That's why the saying defense wins championships is so oft repeated, because its true more often than not.
Franchise QBs are great, even aged ones, but an elite defense is so much better. Get both and amazing things happen. Cowboys already have Romo .....
There is discussion that isn't just set in a mood...which you are a fan of. But a discussion is offered, instead of posturing around a burn barrel. Remember that?
It's a combination of the players and the scheme. Can't put it all on the scheme and the DC because we've been seeing the same problems defensively for years despite all the scheme and DC changes.
But your mood is evident...which you are a fan of.
I stop reading when I hit the stat line. Do you think a Panthers or Broncos D would have help the team this year? This team offense could not cough up 10 points aganist some very sub par teams. Having an elite D is great but our D was good enough to win us 13 games this year if we had better offensive production.