What/Who/Which receivers will make roster?

juck

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,246
Reaction score
244
1. T.O.
2. Glenn
3.Crayton
4.Hurd
5.Steinback
6.Rector

Howmany do they keep?
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
1. TO
2. Glenn
3. Crayton
4. Stanback
5. Austin
6. Hurd
 

Bizwah

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,159
Reaction score
3,877
theogt;1523316 said:
1. TO
2. Glenn
3. Crayton
4. Stanback
5. Austin
6. Hurd

ditto....

Austin has too much potential to cut right now. If push comes to shove, I think we keep him over Hurd (whom I like as well).
 

quincyyyyy

Benched
Messages
463
Reaction score
0
theogt;1523316 said:
1. TO
2. Glenn
3. Crayton
4. Stanback
5. Austin
6. Hurd

I would also agree, just because they have more potential than Rector. But rector is still a really good receiver. He could be a 2nd receiver on teams like the Titans.
 

sago1

Active Member
Messages
7,791
Reaction score
0
TO
Glenn
Crayton*
Hurd
Austin
Stanback

*I think Crayton is a really good #3WR who maybe has the skills to become a good #2. He becomes a FA next year & probably wants lot more money/chance at strating #2 job then we willing to pay. If one of our younger WRs really steps up in TC/preseason games (Hurd?) & continues look good early in regular season, believe Cowboys would trade Crayton if we get a 4th rounder for him rather then nothing at all. The only caveat might be if either TO or Glenn have an injury which might affect their playing for us in 08.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
quincyyyyy;1523332 said:
But rector is still a really good receiver. He could be a 2nd receiver on teams like the Titans.

Psst.

Don't look, but your ignorance is showing again.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,684
Reaction score
12,394
quincyyyyy;1523332 said:
I would also agree, just because they have more potential than Rector. But rector is still a really good receiver. He could be a 2nd receiver on teams like the Titans.

so that's why he went unclaimed when we cut him?
 

ZeroClub

just trying to get better
Messages
7,619
Reaction score
1
Stanback is close to a lock, even if he doesn't play particularly well.
 

Echo9

Erik_H
Messages
3,773
Reaction score
1,814
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
theogt;1523316 said:
1. TO
2. Glenn
3. Crayton
4. Stanback
5. Austin
6. Hurd

Yup that'll be it....unless we're able to stash Stanbeck based on the Lis Franc. (pup?) If so we keep 5.

I kinda think stashin Stanbeck won't happen though...seems he got alot of love on draft day...(from other GMs, not DC fans).
 

Echo9

Erik_H
Messages
3,773
Reaction score
1,814
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
sago1;1523337 said:
TO
Glenn
Crayton*
Hurd
Austin
Stanback

*I think Crayton is a really good #3WR who maybe has the skills to become a good #2. He becomes a FA next year & probably wants lot more money/chance at strating #2 job then we willing to pay. If one of our younger WRs really steps up in TC/preseason games (Hurd?) & continues look good early in regular season, believe Cowboys would trade Crayton if we get a 4th rounder for him rather then nothing at all. The only caveat might be if either TO or Glenn have an injury which might affect their playing for us in 08.


The whole Crayton thing is interesting. I do think we has the potential to be a solid #2....but something tells me it won't be here in 08. There's a good chance he gets Kevin Curtis money in FA and I will be sorry to see him go.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
Erik_H;1523445 said:
The whole Crayton thing is interesting. I do think we has the potential to be a solid #2....but something tells me it won't be here in 08. There's a good chance he gets Kevin Curtis money in FA and I will be sorry to see him go.

If he plays well enough, Jones will keep him.

That is what he does for productive non-injured players.

Besides, Kevin Curtis money is peanuts. Particularly if he may be asked to start, which he easily could be.

This is a big year for him. If he plays well, I don't see any reason to not pay him.
 

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,652
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
ZeroClub;1523437 said:
Stanback is close to a lock, even if he doesn't play particularly well.
Thought that about Skyler too, tho I think Stanbeck will make it. But nothing's a lock.

I'm curious how the guy from the CFL will do.
 

bbgun

Benched
Messages
27,869
Reaction score
6
The grammar of this thread is still screwed up. Since you provided a list of names, it should read "Which receivers will make the roster?"

Lesson over.
 

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,652
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
bbgun;1523469 said:
The grammar of this thread is still screwed up. Since you provided a list of names, it should read "Which receivers will make the roster?"

Lesson over.
Happy?

http://i5.***BLOCKED***/albums/y164/nbr1diva/grammarpolice.jpg
 

bbgun

Benched
Messages
27,869
Reaction score
6
WoodysGirl;1523473 said:
Happy?

http://i5.***BLOCKED***/albums/y164/nbr1diva/grammarpolice.jpg

I'd like to date you. Are you spoken for?
 
Top