bbgun
Benched
- Messages
- 27,869
- Reaction score
- 6
WoodysGirl;1523484 said:I'll always be spoken for if you're asking...
now that's cold
WoodysGirl;1523484 said:I'll always be spoken for if you're asking...
bbgun;1523477 said:I'd like to date you. Are you spoken for?
ice, ice baby...bbgun;1523490 said:now that's cold
WoodysGirl;1523450 said:Thought that about Skyler too, tho I think Stanbeck will make it. But nothing's a lock.
I'm curious how the guy from the CFL will do.
cleverusername;1523491 said:No offense BBgun, but that's borderline creepy. But I guess someone had to ask, because we're all thinking it.
WoodysGirl;1523450 said:Thought that about Skyler too, tho I think Stanbeck will make it. But nothing's a lock.
ZeroClub;1523501 said:Stanback has an unusual amount of support in the front office (including Jerry). Stanback also has a couple of built in "excuses" ... he hasn't played much WR before and his foot has slowed his transition.
That makes it extra tough to cut Stanback, because even if he doesn't perform very well in training camp. people will think its because he hasn't had enough time.
And with Parcells gone, Jerry just might have more "input" into roster decisions.
Considering the amount of love showered on him by Jeff Ireland. I'm more convinced that this was more Ireland than Jerry. I agree that Stanbeck is likely to make the cut, but I also believe that anything is possible.abersonc;1523510 said:This is a Jerry pick -- and Jerry, he'll keep a guy around for a few years so he doesn't look stupid.
Shoot. ~snaps fingers~bbgun;1523506 said:She blew it. I had tickets to the Renaissance Fair and everything. My mom was gonna drop us off. Her loss.
abersonc;1523510 said:This is a Jerry pick -- and Jerry, he'll keep a guy around for a few years so he doesn't look stupid.
Yeah, this is the sort of thing that concerns me most about Jerry now that Parcells being gone.abersonc;1523510 said:This is a Jerry pick -- and Jerry, he'll keep a guy around for a few years so he doesn't look stupid.
6y32m isn't peanuts. Granted, it's no exorbitant, but for a guy who was #3 up until now, that's a nice payday.Alexander;1523447 said:If he plays well enough, Jones will keep him.
That is what he does for productive non-injured players.
Besides, Kevin Curtis money is peanuts. Particularly if he may be asked to start, which he easily could be.
This is a big year for him. If he plays well, I don't see any reason to not pay him.
theogt;1523316 said:1. TO
2. Glenn
3. Crayton
4. Stanback
5. Austin
6. Hurd
Va_BoysFan4 Life;1523580 said:I 32nd this motion that this is our corp of WR if we are taken six.
I also believe like some of you that Crayton will not be with Dallas at the end of the yr. I like him but I think he will be asking to much and I do believe we have some very good youngster that only need some playing time to improve.
Anyone have any knowledge of how the guy from the CFL is doing? I cn not remember his name.
Alexander;1523447 said:If he plays well enough, Jones will keep him.
That is what he does for productive non-injured players.
Besides, Kevin Curtis money is peanuts. Particularly if he may be asked to start, which he easily could be.
This is a big year for him. If he plays well, I don't see any reason to not pay him.
Erik_H;1523543 said:6y32m isn't peanuts. Granted, it's no exorbitant, but for a guy who was #3 up until now, that's a nice payday.
I like Crayton, but I just get a sense he'll be moving on to greener pastures after 07.
...of course you can forget all of that if the Hurd/Austin rumblings are just more Davis-Tucker-Brazzel-Hodge-Chiaverini-Swinton-Rambo-RaWilliams fluff. Crayton has proven enough to get out of the "potential" box.
If Hurd and Austin are actually more of the same empty hype as listed above, then Crayton has a much better chance of sticking around.
btw, writing that list did make me a little sick for second.
Bizwah;1523326 said:ditto....
Austin has too much potential to cut right now. If push comes to shove, I think we keep him over Hurd (whom I like as well).
Alexander;1523447 said:If he plays well enough, Jones will keep him.
That is what he does for productive non-injured players.
Besides, Kevin Curtis money is peanuts. Particularly if he may be asked to start, which he easily could be.
This is a big year for him. If he plays well, I don't see any reason to not pay him.
Hailmary;1523672 said:I personally wouldn't be heartbroken if Crayton doesn't come back after this season or is even traded before the season starts. It's true he's had some productive games, but he disappears way too often for long stretches. The third receiver needs to also contribute on ST and he's done absolutely nothing for us in the return game.