If you watched him be horrible all season, it shouldn't have been a surprise he was horrible.
wow.
Nobody was surprised. What is surprising is how some can acknowledge everything which worked against the team winning that day and how some cannot.
2007 seemed earned. We lost because of ourselves. 2014 seems taken. That's the difference.
Maybe we should get Liam Neeson to call Gene Steratore.
I don't see a how terrible player playing to his ability is working against you. It's getting the expected result.
Ironically enough.. Being that the patriots are always in the mix ... I think we lose either time.
Both stung. But this one more.... A balanced offense, running game through playoffs was our best shot!
If Bozo the Red Head doesn't botch the end of the first half and DeMarco Murray doesn't go all DeMarco Murray when the red sea parted, it's a totally different game. Hell if James Hanna falls on that ball, it's a different game. Just like the Lions did last week, the Cowboys had their chances.
And despite all that it still came down to 4th and 2 and the Cowboys completing a throw to the 1 yard line that was taken away from them.
You can't excuse a bad call because other things could have went differently earlier in the game. If that was the case, no calls in the history of the game screwed a team.
Lambo easy!! This team is full of vets, and young hungry guys. Offensively, We are as good as anyone in the NFL. Defensively, I think we weren't that good, but coached up enough to win it all...this hurts more, because it was right in our hands, we didnt take it, and then it got taken..
.It's like the kid who waited all day for the ice cream cone, only to walk out of the store and half of it falls on the ground, then out of nowhere a dog jumps up and still the rest of the cone right out of his hands.
Play better and one call doesn't decide the game. The fact that the Cowboys couldn't overcome that call and still weren't guaranteed to win even if they'd gotten it means they really didn't deserve to win.
The expected result = major contributing factor for the margin of victory for New York.
Reeves' inability to perform at an NFL level at a crucial time factored into the loss. Yet, that fact does not get mentioned often. Does this factor escape comprehension?