Sydla
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 61,368
- Reaction score
- 94,445
Wish we had kept him and his massive cap hitZeke today:
4 carries for 7 yards (1.8 YPC)
Wish we had kept him and his massive cap hitZeke today:
4 carries for 7 yards (1.8 YPC)
ShoemakerWho are you talking about?
Surely Bill's been saying, *** was I thinkingZeke today:
4 carries for 7 yards (1.8 YPC)
In fairness the RB coach was the run game coordinator and he was out for the season until last week.I’m more disappointed in Brian schottenheimer. The guys value really comes in the ability to have a creative run game. Maybe we have that the issue is MM refuses to call anything other than a dive play but I’m not sure Pollard is being set up for success at all in this offense.
You may not be miserable but you are looking for someone to blame for your angst over the RB position.Did you see the FooFighers on SNL Saturday? First song was horrible. Their previous appearance on SNL was fantastic.
I hope you’re not so miserable today.
I don’t have any angst other than I wish they were better. I have no control over the situation.You may not be miserable but you are looking for someone to blame for your angst over the RB position.
Virtually every poster here was screaming for Pollard to be RB1 last year after a few flashy plays. Life’s different when you’re the man, though. He isn’t and will never be a legit RB1 that can run a team to a deep playoff run.Whomever it was should be fired. PLEASE TRADE FOR A REAL #1 RB!
No, not even close. It was split almost 50-50. Maybe it was more like 60-40 for, not sure, but it was far from "virtually every poster here".Virtually every poster here was screaming for Pollard to be RB1 last year after a few flashy plays. Life’s different when you’re the man, though. He isn’t and will never be a legit RB1 that can run a team to a deep playoff run.
You mean the jockey that has the most career wins and rode several Kentucky Derby winners?Shoemaker
Exactly you are antsy about the RB position and are looking for someone to blame. It's uncertain so I get the angst.I don’t have any angst other than I wish they were better. I have no control over the situation.
Not in the red zone it doesn't. At least not for the Cowboys.Myself, I just think we could use a back with size to partner with Pollard. I think the issue is way overblown because running efficiency doesn't matter much. There is a ton of evidence that playaction still works if your running game is not efficient.
All you fans out there who hated zeke and thought pollard was the next great thing. That’s who.Whomever it was should be fired. PLEASE TRADE FOR A REAL #1 RB!
Actually I believe Steve Cauthen passed him for most career wins in the early 2000s.You mean the jockey that has the most career wins and rode several Kentucky Derby winners?
Not really. The bigger threat your running game presents, the better playaction works.Myself, I just think we could use a back with size to partner with Pollard. I think the issue is way overblown because running efficiency doesn't matter much. There is a ton of evidence that playaction still works if your running game is not efficient.
My bad.. it was Russell Baze who claimed the title of winningest jockey of all time in 2006. But apparently some Brazilian jockey whom I never heard of passed Baze in 2018. I should have remembered Baze because he was a native of the Bay Area and rode most of his winners out there while I was living there. The radio talking heads used to make a huge deal about him. The thing I remember about him is that he would often ride a horse in every race on the schedule on a given day. And he would win like 3/4 of them. Dude was amazing in his ability to guide a horse to victory. Did it over 12,000 times in his career. Just amazing..Actually I believe Steve Cauthen passed him for most career wins in the early 2000s.
NopeNot really. The bigger threat your running game presents, the better playaction works.
Play-action is not correlated to run frequency or effectiveness
Further, play-action effectiveness isn’t reliant on whether a team is good at running the ball or even if a team runs the ball at all. A limiting belief from coaches is that they have to establish to the run to be able to have effective play-action. Data does not support that. For years, play-action success rate has been uncorrelated to rush attempts and rushing success rate. Running play-action is just as effective when you’ve run the ball 30% of the time as it is when you run it 50% of the time.
What’s more, it doesn’t matter if you’re breaking off big chunks on those runs, either. That’s true in season-long data sets and within individual games as well. Regardless of how often a team has rushed in subsequent plays or how well they rushed in subsequent plays, the yards per attempt on play-action remain stable and higher than normal dropback passing.
Yup. And that does not disprove what I said. They were focused on the frequency of runs, not the quality of runs.