BoysForLife
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,987
- Reaction score
- 11,071
Those who pay attention know exactly what your point wasGuess you missed the point, you must be one of the whiners with no clue.
Good post and well done
Those who pay attention know exactly what your point wasGuess you missed the point, you must be one of the whiners with no clue.
Not a burden at all, being right is simply being right, I’ll be the first to admit I was wrong. Give and take when folks like to dish it out they know they will get it back in some form Not sure why you jumped in but go read some old posts of your buddy and then maybe you will understand a little better.
tell me how they could have not called that DPI, Bradberry tackled him? the roughing the passer was obvious as was the encroachmentI
The Eagles were flagged twice on our last drive which helped move the ball past mid-field in short order and opportunity to win the game.
Funny how this is being glossed over by the conspiracy crew.
the fact their crappy safety tackled him before the ball got there?This has always been a rule hasnt it, it happens every game , forward progress is when the knee, shin, forearm hits the ground and you Mark where tge ball is. What am I missing?
Explain these calls & non-calls favoring the opponent...
Holding is holding is holding. Either call it for both teams or forget it. This is nonsense. Grabbing and holding the jersey is holding. You cannot parse it. Saying oh the guy being held is doing thus and such which makes it not holding. And so where was the holding of Parsons trying to move laterally in the middle of the field and at the point of attack. Your analysis is total BS. Either allow holding the jersey regardless or not. This is all BS.This is what happens when folks like you watch a clip without knowing why it was called or not called. They will not usually call holding when the player is in front of them when the player moves away you can’t keep hold of his jersey if you really watched the game it was fully explained as for PI that’s always subjective and if the teams were reversed you would say good calls. It’s pretty obvious you never played competitive football or you would know this. The biggest miss was holding on MP. MM team is a penalty machine since he’s been here, if you have complaint take it up with him. Don’t see say bad calls on those illegal contact that helped Dallas but wouldn’t expect objectify from you only tin foil hat and they plates all suck but #4 who played very well yesterday for 59 minutes.
Ah, yes, so on one end you blame the “conspiring” refs for missing blatant penalties that should have been flagged, then you turn around and claim “how could they not make the obvious call” on the flags they do throw.tell me how they could have not called that DPI, Bradberry tackled him? the roughing the passer was obvious as was the encroachment
It also was not "glossed over" but as usual the never blame the ref holier than thou types forget that had the calls been more evenly distributed throughout the game, we might not have needed that last drive. The weak DPI on Gilmore, the non call on small play Slay, the two holds, one called, one not. The bad spot early on. Had those calls been changed, the result might be different.
Explain these calls & non-calls favoring the opponent...
The Fing fix is in. These are inexplicable except for incompetence or corruption. All at the point of attack with 7 officials on the field. At least one official would have had to have seen what presumably 100 million saw on the monitor and the stadium. The very same holding, balatant and at the point of attack. *** is the official doing if he is not watching this when he clearly was when Dallas was holding. Either call it for both teams or let it go. Otherwise we can only conclude incompetence or corruption. No other explanation is possible.
He won't respond to your statement, because he can't unless he admits the refs showed their bias officiating. Same thing with the no call on Micah.the fact their crappy safety tackled him before the ball got there?
What a joke.You obviously don't get sarcasm
That's a standard line of the guy he was replying to
Anyone who criticizes Dak "was a bench warmer" or "played in the marching band"
Guy says it all the time, while bragging incessantly about his supposed "all state" HS career.
@Brax was just giving him a taste of his own meds
I think you need to pay more attention to the people you defend.
I can tell you what I accomplished past midnight on my high school football field , but not in this forum.
Exactly right. Once a player tries to disengage to chart a path to the ball carrier and you restrict him, that's a hold. Agreed on the Parsons missed hold they highlighted.The Eagles player was trying to pull back away from the hold, that's why it got called. The other one didn't get called because our defender was still trying to push through the blocker. The one they missed on Parsons was blatant though.
Accomplished, I played, HS, service league ball like many have, you’ve done everything according to you. Did you play ball in the Corps or was it army besides your all pro days and college and semipro careers. I bet you played a lot with out your helmet.What a joke.
What have you or @Brax ever accomplished on the football field? Come on. Intriguing minds want to know.
It really is pathetic how whiny some of our fans are. They must be nightmares to deal with in real life. Constant excuse makers are exhausting.He'd rather make excuses which is sad. Cowboys: 10 penalties for 83 yards. Eagles: 10 for 98 yards. Yes, they missed some calls but they missed some calls that would have hurt the Cowboys too.
Thank you for your opinion.You obviously don't get sarcasm
That's a standard line of the guy he was replying to
Anyone who criticizes Dak "was a bench warmer" or "played in the marching band"
Guy says it all the time, while bragging incessantly about his supposed "all state" HS career.
@Brax was just giving him a taste of his own meds
I think you need to pay more attention to the people you defend.