Who stays/who goes within our DL Rotation

baltcowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,330
Reaction score
17,980
Think we have to move on from Osa, just think he is more of a rotational type and he will be paid to be a starter
I think we need to keep the line together and just add two peices. We need to get one of these top 5 in the draft defensive tackles and a solid free agent piece to rotate with Osa and Mazi. Then you have a good tackle rotation. Parsons. Kneeland, Gholston and Sam is a good defensive end rotation as well. I think Osa is good with talent around him. To me this is the best way to improve our front 4. We need to add pieces not lose what we already have.
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,985
Reaction score
20,107
I think we need to keep the line together and just add two peices. We need to get one of these top 5 in the draft defensive tackles and a solid free agent piece to rotate with Osa and Mazi. Then you have a good tackle rotation. Parsons. Kneeland, Gholston and Sam is a good defensive end rotation as well. I think Osa is good with talent around him. To me this is the best way to improve our front 4. We need to add pieces not lose what we already have.
In my opinion, you want to upgrade not run the same guys out there who have struggled
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,712
Reaction score
9,652
I think Osa is a very solid player…he just needs help in more of a rotation.

I’d definitely consider extending him if the price is right.

Same for Golston.
 

baltcowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,330
Reaction score
17,980
In my opinion, you want to upgrade not run the same guys out there who have struggled
So you’re going to depend on a rookie defensive linemen by himself to solve the run defense? That is how we got Mazi.
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,985
Reaction score
20,107
You do that and keep Osa. What free agent defensive tackle out there that is a better 3 tech than Osa? You need 4 tackles not 2.
OSA is an average starter in this league and no longer be on a rookie contract. He reminds me of the Hitchens discussion several years ago, another ok starter that got overpaid on the open market. You can find an older veteran fa starter for less, add another veteran NT like a Hankins and use the draft for 1-2 more.
 

baltcowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,330
Reaction score
17,980
OSA is an average starter in this league and no longer be on a rookie contract. He reminds me of the Hitchens discussion several years ago, another ok starter that got overpaid on the open market. You can find an older veteran fa starter for less, add another veteran NT like a Hankins and use the draft for 1-2 more.
Hankins is no Osa. You need a real defensive tackle if you’re going to replace the guy. You are really underrating him. Graham, Mazi, and Hankins will not solve our run defense.
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,985
Reaction score
20,107
Hankins is no Osa. You need a real defensive tackle if you’re going to replace the guy. You are really underrating him. Graham, Mazi, and Hankins will not solve our run
You sign a Hankins type AND a 3t starter like a Hill from the bengals.
 

baltcowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,330
Reaction score
17,980
You sign a Hankins type AND a 3t starter like a Hill from the bengals.
Why not keep OSA with Hill and have Graham/Mazi at the one tech. That would be the perfect outcome. I don’t understand why our owner won’t spend on the defensive tackle position. It’s not crazy expensive.
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,985
Reaction score
20,107
Why not keep OSA with Hill and have Graham/Mazi at the one tech. That would be the perfect outcome. I don’t understand why our owner won’t spend on the defensive tackle position. It’s not crazy expensive.
Cause he isn’t going to be worth what he is going to get on the open market
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,645
Reaction score
112,098
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Cowboys need 2 DT's. One in FA and one in the draft or get 2 in the draft.

I can't see anyone complaining if they went DT with their 1st and 2nd rounder.

It's time to stop messing around and get serious. Watching teams consistently run against us is ridiculous.
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,985
Reaction score
20,107
Cowboys need 2 DT's. One in FA and one in the draft or get 2 in the draft.

I can't see anyone complaining if they went DT with their 1st and 2nd rounder.

It's time to stop messing around and get serious. Watching teams consistently run against us is ridiculous.
Couldn’t agree more!
 

tm1119

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,935
Reaction score
8,674
I think we need to keep the line together and just add two peices. We need to get one of these top 5 in the draft defensive tackles and a solid free agent piece to rotate with Osa and Mazi. Then you have a good tackle rotation. Parsons. Kneeland, Gholston and Sam is a good defensive end rotation as well. I think Osa is good with talent around him. To me this is the best way to improve our front 4. We need to add pieces not lose what we already have.
The issue is how much are you willing to invest in Osa to be a rotational player? If we draft a top 12 Dt that player is starting over Osa. Sure they can rotate and play together situationally, but you’re still only talking about 40-50% of the snaps for Osa.
In a perfect world I agree that keeping Osa would be ideal, but with so many holes across the roster you have to be smart with your resources.

Also, those 4 DE’s are not enough. It would be a classic Cowboys mistake to go into next season thinking that Kneeland/Williams are going to be good and we don’t need to add. Both the front office and fans fall in love with any/every player drafted by the Cowboys.
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,712
Reaction score
9,652
The issue is how much are you willing to invest in Osa to be a rotational player? If we draft a top 12 Dt that player is starting over Osa. Sure they can rotate and play together situationally, but you’re still only talking about 40-50% of the snaps for Osa.
In a perfect world I agree that keeping Osa would be ideal, but with so many holes across the roster you have to be smart with your resources.

Also, those 4 DE’s are not enough. It would be a classic Cowboys mistake to go into next season thinking that Kneeland/Williams are going to be good and we don’t need to add. Both the front office and fans fall in love with any/every player drafted by the Cowboys.
I’m fine with letting Osa walk…but if you do how do you at least get equal play at the 3T position? A rookie, no matter when selected, likely isn’t coming in as good in year 1 and if you pay less in FA you’re likely getting a lesser player.

Best scenario IMO is signing Osa and another DT in FA while still targeting a DT or 2 in the draft.
 

Landryhat73

Well-Known Member
Messages
871
Reaction score
785
OSA is going to be interesting. He is a player I wish the organization would have targeted earlier and giving a contract extension. By waiting to he is a URF and probably the top DT on the market it will be expensive now. Dallas always waits and the extra millions it takes adds up.
 

baltcowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,330
Reaction score
17,980
The issue is how much are you willing to invest in Osa to be a rotational player? If we draft a top 12 Dt that player is starting over Osa. Sure they can rotate and play together situationally, but you’re still only talking about 40-50% of the snaps for Osa.
In a perfect world I agree that keeping Osa would be ideal, but with so many holes across the roster you have to be smart with your resources.

Also, those 4 DE’s are not enough. It would be a classic Cowboys mistake to go into next season thinking that Kneeland/Williams are going to be good and we don’t need to add. Both the front office and fans fall in love with any/every player drafted by the Cowboys.
The Cowboys have weaknesses all over the roster. You are going have to survive with a position like defensive end if your going to invest draft and free agent money to get better in the middle of the defense. You all seem to forget that we need a top notch runhing back and skill players to help out the offense.
 

Sully

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,056
Reaction score
1,861
Our first priority is to fix this poor run defense, in my opinion, to do that you need bigger personnel along the DL. Have to move away, from those undersized, quick twitch lineman that Marinelli/Quinn targeted. A player like Graham fits like a glove, he has the size/strength to be good on the early downs, but also has pass rush abilities to play on the money down.
Agree--- fix this run defense then the OL
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,985
Reaction score
20,107
I’m fine with letting Osa walk…but if you do how do you at least get equal play at the 3T position? A rookie, no matter when selected, likely isn’t coming in as good in year 1 and if you pay less in FA you’re likely getting a lesser player.

Best scenario IMO is signing Osa and another DT in FA while still targeting a DT or 2 in the draft.
It’s all about price and having a 60 million qb that squeezes their resources
 
Top