CowboyWay;2966323 said:I've been thinking about going with a Macbook pro for my next laptop.
Any of you use them exclusively? Are they as good as advertised, would you ever go back?
theogt;2966362 said:Depends on what you're using it for.
For 95% of the answers to that question, PC is better.
CowboyWay;2966323 said:I've been thinking about going with a Macbook pro for my next laptop.
Any of you use them exclusively? Are they as good as advertised, would you ever go back?
tomson75;2966364 said:Prove it...or at least support it. That's a wildly inaccurate statement.
What he said.nyc;2966365 said:Do you just browse the web, doctor photos, and listen to iTunes?
If you do anything more advanced business or gaming wise, it would be a mistake.
nyc;2966365 said:Do you just browse the web, doctor photos, and listen to iTunes?
If you do anything more advanced business or gaming wise, it would be a mistake.
CowboyWay;2966323 said:I've been thinking about going with a Macbook pro for my next laptop.
Any of you use them exclusively? Are they as good as advertised, would you ever go back?
You say this, then tell us you do exactly what I said it is good for.vta;2966449 said:That's not true at all.
Exactly what I said. Not for games or anything but photo editing, iTunes, and web browsing. Illustrator is a graphical art program. While I didn't name it specifically, I still fits in the same category.vta;2966449 said:My living is earned 100% with a Mac and games are not even a consideration, (they're time-wasters). The value of a thing is if it actually brings you gains. As an illustrator/photographer, all of my work is done on a Mac. That's not to say the same can't be said for a Windows box, it's all a matter of preference or simply not knowing the other.
Rinse and repeatvta;2966449 said:Mac has always been superior in color management, and sub-par at 3D and were generally slower until Mac switched to Intel. They were also inferior in advertising throughout the 90's, which created the head start for Windows.
Incorrect. There ARE viruses for Macs. The reason you don't see as many is because Mac are very limited use. What I mean by that is there are probably a billion Windows users, compared to a few million Mac users. If you're going to write a virus, you do it to attack as many as possible. You wouldn't waste time writing one to attack 10 people, you would write one to attack 10s of thousands or more.vta;2966449 said:The problems that occur differ because of architecture and not the number of people using. No virus' on a Mac because nothing can execute without your say, but some physical problems lead to trouble, because of the proprietary nature of Mac. Both have their + & -'s.
nyc;2966511 said:You say this, then tell us you do exactly what I said it is good for.
Exactly what I said. Not for games or anything but photo editing, iTunes, and web browsing. Illustrator is a graphical art program. While I didn't name it specifically, I still fits in the same category. Rinse and repeat
nyc;2966511 said:Incorrect. There ARE viruses for Macs. The reason you don't see as many is because Mac are very limited use. What I mean by that is there are probably a billion Windows users, compared to a few million Mac users. If you're going to write a virus, you do it to attack as many as possible. You wouldn't waste time writing one to attack 10 people, you would write one to attack 10s of thousands or more.
To say you can't execute anything on a Mac without specifically saying so is a load of garbage. The only kind of attack that a user specifically says to execute is a Trojan virus. Trojans aren't the only viruses and Macs are affected by not only Trojans, but many many other types of attacks.
Did you know that Apple has release Mac Anti-Virus? Odd isn't it since Mac doesn't suffer from Viruses.
About.com's Mac Virus FAQ
nyc;2966563 said:I know exactly what Illustrator is. Before my current employment I was the infrastructure engineer for one of the biggest marketing firms in the world. We had entire departments that used Macs. I will also note, that ONLY the artistic departments used Macs. ...and for very good reason.
You're living in a dream if you think the only reason Windows has more viruses is because Apple is more secure. Windows has it's security issues, but that isn't the reason it has more viruses.
btw, more viruses exist for Macs than Linux. Linux must be far more secure!
You can say "a great number" but you can also say "a very small minority" of professionals earn their keep with a Mac.vta;2966589 said:Then you should know, Illustrator is vector art software and has nothing to with doctoring photos and isn't a necessary requirement to being an illustrator.
One could say, that outside of the art department, why would anyone pay that kind of money for a typewriter?? But believe it or not they do. All of the copy editors, writers and researchers for the Pharma-Ad industry I work in uses: Macbooks. Coincidently just what the OP asked for a gauge of it's worth, i.e. aside from surfing, iTunes and photo doctoring, you can do plenty with a Mac, as a great number of professionals earn their keep with a Mac.
And you should also know that Linux is based on Unix. Mac OS X is also based on Unix, which is why it is far more secure than Windows. You can also run Windows within Mac OS X, so therefore, you get both OS's for one machine and can play the same games, if you're inclined.
davidyee;2966493 said:...a photographer, designer, architect, film maker, musician or associated in anyway with the visual and audio arts then go with the MAC.
The machine and the software vendors will make life infinitely more enjoyable.
If you are running a purely business machine check with your employer or software vendors in your job sector. There are many proprietary programs developed for industries that will only run on a PC.
If your just reading the CowboysZone and staring at naked pictures both will do.
The MAC does come at a premium and typically those who can absorb the premium do so for functional purposes. IE they are in the audio/visual arts category.
Spend your money wisely.
CowboyWay;2966674 said:Let me clarify a few things from my original post....
I know macs are superior in the graphic arts/printing world. And maybe I'd dabble in some of that, but primarily I would use this computer as just my recreational computer.
Internet, running OS, Windows, and even Linux.
Most importantly, I just want a computer that is built like a tank. I've always had trouble with PC's. Its just always "something" with them. I was hoping I could drop 2K on a mac and just flat out be done with the nagging little problems that always seem to come up.
Is it overkill for what I'd use it for? Sure, I knew that when I started thinking about buying one. I just want one that will work like a rented mule, no matter what I someday decide to throw at it.
My cousin moved in with me and my family for a while, and he has an older mac. I've been using it lately, and I must say, its a damn workhorse. Faster than lighting, despite my PC's supposedly having faster processors, and more RAM. It just "feels" like its built like a tank, and that the sum***** will just run and run, and run.