Mickey, has been covering the team since the 1980s. Don't know how more credible you need to be. But that's just me..
Not sure I'm communicating here.
There is a credibility that coaches and some players bring to exes and ohs discussion that the rest of us, even someone who has covered a team for decades, just naturally cannot. That's all I'm getting at. But moreover, Mickey doesn't contribute that kind of input anyway. He may have an opinion of why a play worked or didn't, but he's not going to analyze how Free got off his first block to the next level, or other intricacies (as a rule)
My answer isn't your idea of communication, unless I agree with you.
And I've heard many times Mickey break down aspects of the game such as you described above.
Not your idea of credibility, but for me yes.
Same here. But only I'm not from DallasI'm not from the Break.
I'm among the living.
I'm in Dallas.
I'm smarter than Mickey.
I have a far better command of the English language than Nate.
I'm more handsome than Rob.
Finally, I might at some point just punch Mickey in the face on camera.
Helmans a dweeb but is more tolerable than Mickey and Nate. I wish we could trade Nate for Darren Woodson